Effect of participatory research on farmers' knowledge and practice of IPM: The case of cotton in Benin

C.E. Togbe, R. Haagsma, A.K.N. Aoudji, S.D. Vodouhe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This study assesses the effect of participatory research on farmers’ knowledge and practice of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) in Benin. The participatory field experiments were carried out during the 2011–2012 cotton growing season, and focused on the development and application of pest management knowledge. Methodology: A ‘Difference-in-Differences’ methodology was used to document the changes in farmers’ knowledge and practices across the following season, 2012–2013. Of the 180 cotton growers sampled, 150 took part in the research, while 30 served as the control. Findings: Participation in the research increased farmers’ ability to recognise pests and natural enemies and how to use thresholds and apply bio-pesticides. Increase in knowledge did not lead to any modification in the farmers’ use of neem oil and the entomopathogen Beauveria, but it did lead to a significant change in threshold-based pesticide applications. Farmers seemed to want to reduce pest management costs, whatever the type of pesticide recommended (conventional or biobased). Practical Implications: Development practitioners should be aware that changes in practices of IPM are not only knowledge driven. Other factors such as financial consideration and specific input availability are also needed for the success of an effective pest management strategy. Originality/Value: In any interactive process, the Difference-in-Differences methodology is an appropriate tool for an effective assessment of changes in farmers’ knowledge and practices over time.
LanguageEnglish
Pages421-440
JournalJournal of Agricultural Education and Extension
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

farmers knowledge
Benin
Pest Control
integrated pest management
pest control
agricultural product
cotton
farmer
farmers
pest management
Pesticides
methodology
pesticide
management
Research
neem
pesticide application
pesticides
Beauveria
growing season

Cite this

@article{33111b5682534ca190aee9570614b33f,
title = "Effect of participatory research on farmers' knowledge and practice of IPM: The case of cotton in Benin",
abstract = "Purpose: This study assesses the effect of participatory research on farmers’ knowledge and practice of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) in Benin. The participatory field experiments were carried out during the 2011–2012 cotton growing season, and focused on the development and application of pest management knowledge. Methodology: A ‘Difference-in-Differences’ methodology was used to document the changes in farmers’ knowledge and practices across the following season, 2012–2013. Of the 180 cotton growers sampled, 150 took part in the research, while 30 served as the control. Findings: Participation in the research increased farmers’ ability to recognise pests and natural enemies and how to use thresholds and apply bio-pesticides. Increase in knowledge did not lead to any modification in the farmers’ use of neem oil and the entomopathogen Beauveria, but it did lead to a significant change in threshold-based pesticide applications. Farmers seemed to want to reduce pest management costs, whatever the type of pesticide recommended (conventional or biobased). Practical Implications: Development practitioners should be aware that changes in practices of IPM are not only knowledge driven. Other factors such as financial consideration and specific input availability are also needed for the success of an effective pest management strategy. Originality/Value: In any interactive process, the Difference-in-Differences methodology is an appropriate tool for an effective assessment of changes in farmers’ knowledge and practices over time.",
author = "C.E. Togbe and R. Haagsma and A.K.N. Aoudji and S.D. Vodouhe",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/1389224X.2014.971829",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "421--440",
journal = "The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension",
issn = "1389-224X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "5",

}

Effect of participatory research on farmers' knowledge and practice of IPM: The case of cotton in Benin. / Togbe, C.E.; Haagsma, R.; Aoudji, A.K.N.; Vodouhe, S.D.

In: Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, Vol. 21, No. 5, 2015, p. 421-440.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of participatory research on farmers' knowledge and practice of IPM: The case of cotton in Benin

AU - Togbe, C.E.

AU - Haagsma, R.

AU - Aoudji, A.K.N.

AU - Vodouhe, S.D.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Purpose: This study assesses the effect of participatory research on farmers’ knowledge and practice of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) in Benin. The participatory field experiments were carried out during the 2011–2012 cotton growing season, and focused on the development and application of pest management knowledge. Methodology: A ‘Difference-in-Differences’ methodology was used to document the changes in farmers’ knowledge and practices across the following season, 2012–2013. Of the 180 cotton growers sampled, 150 took part in the research, while 30 served as the control. Findings: Participation in the research increased farmers’ ability to recognise pests and natural enemies and how to use thresholds and apply bio-pesticides. Increase in knowledge did not lead to any modification in the farmers’ use of neem oil and the entomopathogen Beauveria, but it did lead to a significant change in threshold-based pesticide applications. Farmers seemed to want to reduce pest management costs, whatever the type of pesticide recommended (conventional or biobased). Practical Implications: Development practitioners should be aware that changes in practices of IPM are not only knowledge driven. Other factors such as financial consideration and specific input availability are also needed for the success of an effective pest management strategy. Originality/Value: In any interactive process, the Difference-in-Differences methodology is an appropriate tool for an effective assessment of changes in farmers’ knowledge and practices over time.

AB - Purpose: This study assesses the effect of participatory research on farmers’ knowledge and practice of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) in Benin. The participatory field experiments were carried out during the 2011–2012 cotton growing season, and focused on the development and application of pest management knowledge. Methodology: A ‘Difference-in-Differences’ methodology was used to document the changes in farmers’ knowledge and practices across the following season, 2012–2013. Of the 180 cotton growers sampled, 150 took part in the research, while 30 served as the control. Findings: Participation in the research increased farmers’ ability to recognise pests and natural enemies and how to use thresholds and apply bio-pesticides. Increase in knowledge did not lead to any modification in the farmers’ use of neem oil and the entomopathogen Beauveria, but it did lead to a significant change in threshold-based pesticide applications. Farmers seemed to want to reduce pest management costs, whatever the type of pesticide recommended (conventional or biobased). Practical Implications: Development practitioners should be aware that changes in practices of IPM are not only knowledge driven. Other factors such as financial consideration and specific input availability are also needed for the success of an effective pest management strategy. Originality/Value: In any interactive process, the Difference-in-Differences methodology is an appropriate tool for an effective assessment of changes in farmers’ knowledge and practices over time.

U2 - 10.1080/1389224X.2014.971829

DO - 10.1080/1389224X.2014.971829

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 421

EP - 440

JO - The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension

T2 - The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension

JF - The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension

SN - 1389-224X

IS - 5

ER -