Education for Development Association (EfDA) end line report - MFS II country evaluations, Civil Society component

D.C. Klaver, J. Jacobs, M. Hofstede, W. Terefa, H. Getaw, D. Getu

Research output: Book/ReportReportProfessional


This report describes the findings of the end line assessment of the Ethiopian Education for Development Association (EfDA) that is a partner of Edukans Foundation under the Connect4Change (C4C) Consortium. It assesses EfDA’s contribution towards strengthening Civil Society in Ethiopia and it used the CIVICUS analytical framework. It is a follow-up of a baseline study conducted in 2012. Key questions that are being answered comprise changes in the five CIVICUS dimensions to which EfDA contributed; the nature of its contribution; the relevance of the contribution made and an identification of factors that explain EfDA’s role in civil society strengthening. The evaluation was commissioned by NWO-WOTRO, the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research in the Netherlands and is part of the programmatic evaluation of the Co-Financing System - MFS II financed by the Dutch Government, whose overall aim is to strengthen civil society in the South as a building block for structural poverty reduction. Apart from assessing impact on MDGs, the evaluation also assesses the contribution of the Dutch Co-Funding Agencies to strengthen the capacities of their Southern Partners, as well as the contribution of these partners towards building a vibrant civil society arena.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationWageningen
PublisherCentre for Development Innovation, Wageningen UR
Number of pages60
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Publication series

NameReport / Wageningen UR, Centre for Development Innovation
PublisherCentre for Development Innovation, Wageningen UR


  • civil society
  • society
  • empowerment
  • development projects
  • ethiopia
  • east africa
  • africa

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Education for Development Association (EfDA) end line report - MFS II country evaluations, Civil Society component'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this