TY - JOUR
T1 - Ecosystem Services as (Co-)performative Practice
T2 - Experiences from Integrated Water Management in Flanders
AU - Van Herzele, Ann
AU - Ceuterick, Melissa
AU - Buizer, Marleen
AU - Leone, Michael
PY - 2019/8/1
Y1 - 2019/8/1
N2 - Environmental concepts are performative in that they help create the environment they describe. This paper explores the performativity of the ecosystem services concept in the field of integrated water management in Flanders (northern Belgium). The data was collected from 23 in-depth interviews with professionals in the field, conducted in two rounds with a five-year interval and complemented with on-site observations of practices applying the concept. Results indicate that ecosystem services was only marginally performative on its own, and rather was seen as a ‘co-performative concept’ that – in conjunction with existing concepts – could accelerate the envisioned integration process through promoting initiatives, mobilising stakeholders, shaping orientation, creating win-win situations, and more. Yet, despite these aspirations, the concept has in general failed to perform as expected. Many perceived ecosystem services as an academic concept, too complex for practical application. Common strategies were either to adapt the concept to fit one's professional context or to create a new practical context (a stakeholder workshop, for example) where the concept could function. The paper goes on to discuss the more general implications of the (pseudo-)malleability and context-dependence of the ecosystem services concept.
AB - Environmental concepts are performative in that they help create the environment they describe. This paper explores the performativity of the ecosystem services concept in the field of integrated water management in Flanders (northern Belgium). The data was collected from 23 in-depth interviews with professionals in the field, conducted in two rounds with a five-year interval and complemented with on-site observations of practices applying the concept. Results indicate that ecosystem services was only marginally performative on its own, and rather was seen as a ‘co-performative concept’ that – in conjunction with existing concepts – could accelerate the envisioned integration process through promoting initiatives, mobilising stakeholders, shaping orientation, creating win-win situations, and more. Yet, despite these aspirations, the concept has in general failed to perform as expected. Many perceived ecosystem services as an academic concept, too complex for practical application. Common strategies were either to adapt the concept to fit one's professional context or to create a new practical context (a stakeholder workshop, for example) where the concept could function. The paper goes on to discuss the more general implications of the (pseudo-)malleability and context-dependence of the ecosystem services concept.
KW - Ecosystem services
KW - Environmental concepts
KW - Integrated Water Resources Management
KW - Malleability
KW - Performativity
KW - Socio-technical agencement
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.021
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.021
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85064935559
SN - 0921-8009
VL - 162
SP - 29
EP - 38
JO - Ecological Economics
JF - Ecological Economics
ER -