Ecosystem Services as (Co-)performative Practice: Experiences from Integrated Water Management in Flanders

Ann Van Herzele, Melissa Ceuterick, Marleen Buizer, Michael Leone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Environmental concepts are performative in that they help create the environment they describe. This paper explores the performativity of the ecosystem services concept in the field of integrated water management in Flanders (northern Belgium). The data was collected from 23 in-depth interviews with professionals in the field, conducted in two rounds with a five-year interval and complemented with on-site observations of practices applying the concept. Results indicate that ecosystem services was only marginally performative on its own, and rather was seen as a ‘co-performative concept’ that – in conjunction with existing concepts – could accelerate the envisioned integration process through promoting initiatives, mobilising stakeholders, shaping orientation, creating win-win situations, and more. Yet, despite these aspirations, the concept has in general failed to perform as expected. Many perceived ecosystem services as an academic concept, too complex for practical application. Common strategies were either to adapt the concept to fit one's professional context or to create a new practical context (a stakeholder workshop, for example) where the concept could function. The paper goes on to discuss the more general implications of the (pseudo-)malleability and context-dependence of the ecosystem services concept.

LanguageEnglish
Pages29-38
JournalEcological Economics
Volume162
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

ecosystem service
water management
stakeholder
Ecosystem services
Integrated
Water management
Flanders

Keywords

  • Ecosystem services
  • Environmental concepts
  • Integrated Water Resources Management
  • Malleability
  • Performativity
  • Socio-technical agencement

Cite this

@article{556806bc759e4adaafb64c70d7f7a08a,
title = "Ecosystem Services as (Co-)performative Practice: Experiences from Integrated Water Management in Flanders",
abstract = "Environmental concepts are performative in that they help create the environment they describe. This paper explores the performativity of the ecosystem services concept in the field of integrated water management in Flanders (northern Belgium). The data was collected from 23 in-depth interviews with professionals in the field, conducted in two rounds with a five-year interval and complemented with on-site observations of practices applying the concept. Results indicate that ecosystem services was only marginally performative on its own, and rather was seen as a ‘co-performative concept’ that – in conjunction with existing concepts – could accelerate the envisioned integration process through promoting initiatives, mobilising stakeholders, shaping orientation, creating win-win situations, and more. Yet, despite these aspirations, the concept has in general failed to perform as expected. Many perceived ecosystem services as an academic concept, too complex for practical application. Common strategies were either to adapt the concept to fit one's professional context or to create a new practical context (a stakeholder workshop, for example) where the concept could function. The paper goes on to discuss the more general implications of the (pseudo-)malleability and context-dependence of the ecosystem services concept.",
keywords = "Ecosystem services, Environmental concepts, Integrated Water Resources Management, Malleability, Performativity, Socio-technical agencement",
author = "{Van Herzele}, Ann and Melissa Ceuterick and Marleen Buizer and Michael Leone",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.021",
language = "English",
volume = "162",
pages = "29--38",
journal = "Ecological Economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Ecosystem Services as (Co-)performative Practice : Experiences from Integrated Water Management in Flanders. / Van Herzele, Ann; Ceuterick, Melissa; Buizer, Marleen; Leone, Michael.

In: Ecological Economics, Vol. 162, 01.08.2019, p. 29-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ecosystem Services as (Co-)performative Practice

T2 - Ecological Economics

AU - Van Herzele, Ann

AU - Ceuterick, Melissa

AU - Buizer, Marleen

AU - Leone, Michael

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - Environmental concepts are performative in that they help create the environment they describe. This paper explores the performativity of the ecosystem services concept in the field of integrated water management in Flanders (northern Belgium). The data was collected from 23 in-depth interviews with professionals in the field, conducted in two rounds with a five-year interval and complemented with on-site observations of practices applying the concept. Results indicate that ecosystem services was only marginally performative on its own, and rather was seen as a ‘co-performative concept’ that – in conjunction with existing concepts – could accelerate the envisioned integration process through promoting initiatives, mobilising stakeholders, shaping orientation, creating win-win situations, and more. Yet, despite these aspirations, the concept has in general failed to perform as expected. Many perceived ecosystem services as an academic concept, too complex for practical application. Common strategies were either to adapt the concept to fit one's professional context or to create a new practical context (a stakeholder workshop, for example) where the concept could function. The paper goes on to discuss the more general implications of the (pseudo-)malleability and context-dependence of the ecosystem services concept.

AB - Environmental concepts are performative in that they help create the environment they describe. This paper explores the performativity of the ecosystem services concept in the field of integrated water management in Flanders (northern Belgium). The data was collected from 23 in-depth interviews with professionals in the field, conducted in two rounds with a five-year interval and complemented with on-site observations of practices applying the concept. Results indicate that ecosystem services was only marginally performative on its own, and rather was seen as a ‘co-performative concept’ that – in conjunction with existing concepts – could accelerate the envisioned integration process through promoting initiatives, mobilising stakeholders, shaping orientation, creating win-win situations, and more. Yet, despite these aspirations, the concept has in general failed to perform as expected. Many perceived ecosystem services as an academic concept, too complex for practical application. Common strategies were either to adapt the concept to fit one's professional context or to create a new practical context (a stakeholder workshop, for example) where the concept could function. The paper goes on to discuss the more general implications of the (pseudo-)malleability and context-dependence of the ecosystem services concept.

KW - Ecosystem services

KW - Environmental concepts

KW - Integrated Water Resources Management

KW - Malleability

KW - Performativity

KW - Socio-technical agencement

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.021

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.021

M3 - Article

VL - 162

SP - 29

EP - 38

JO - Ecological Economics

JF - Ecological Economics

SN - 0921-8009

ER -