Ecological resilience in lakes and the conjunction fallacy

Bryan M. Spears*, Martyn N. Futter, Erik Jeppesen, Brian J. Huser, Stephen Ives, Thomas A. Davidson, Rita Adrian, David G. Angeler, Sarah J. Burthe, Laurence Carvalho, Francis Daunt, Alena S. Gsell, Dag O. Hessen, Annette B.G. Janssen, Eleanor B. Mackay, Linda May, Heather Moorhouse, Saara Olsen, Martin Søndergaard, Helen WoodsStephen J. Thackeray

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a pressing need to apply stability and resilience theory to environmental management to restore degraded ecosystems effectively and to mitigate the effects of impending environmental change. Lakes represent excellent model case studies in this respect and have been used widely to demonstrate theories of ecological stability and resilience that are needed to underpin preventative management approaches. However, we argue that this approach is not yet fully developed because the pursuit of empirical evidence to underpin such theoretically grounded management continues in the absence of an objective probability framework. This has blurred the lines between intuitive logic (based on the elementary principles of probability) and extensional logic (based on assumption and belief) in this field.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1616-1624
JournalNature Ecology & Evolution
Volume1
Early online date16 Oct 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ecological resilience in lakes and the conjunction fallacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this