Abstract
The recently adopted EU Nature Restoration Law (NRL) requires nature restoration measures in all European member states. The majority of these measures depend on the cooperation of landowners/managers and regional and local authorities. However, it is not always clear which measures gain stakeholder support and why. This article considers the current support for a wide range of restoration measures, as well as the explanatory factors for this support, in two cross-border Natura 2000 sites and their immediate surroundings. In both areas, measures regarding blue-green infrastructure in agricultural land and restoration measures in nature reserves are widely supported. There is less to no support for on-field measures in agricultural areas and for conversions from agricultural land to nature. Most stakeholders show a similar support for the different measures and recognise certain factors as important motivations or barriers in implementing or supporting restoration measures. These insights can help reduce the tension in the debate around the NRL and look for a nature restoration strategy that takes into account the support of all stakeholders.
| Translated title of the contribution | The support for nature restoration: Insights from De Zoom-Kalmthoutse heide and Sint Jansberg-Reichswald |
|---|---|
| Original language | Dutch |
| Pages (from-to) | 110-117 |
| Journal | Landschap: Tijdschrift voor landschapsonderzoek |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The support for nature restoration: Insights from De Zoom-Kalmthoutse heide and Sint Jansberg-Reichswald'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
Restore-Connect - Restoring connectivity and landscape coherence (KB-36-007-001)
van der Sluis, T. (Project Leader)
1/01/23 → 31/12/24
Project: LVVN project
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver