'Doing differences': the emergence of differences in issue framing in multi-actor conversations

A. Dewulf, R. Bouwen

Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference paperAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In this paper we analyze how differences in issue framing emerge in multi-stakeholder conversations. From a discursive approach to issue framing we draw on conversational studies of disagreement, difference and conflict to build up a theoretical framework. This leads us to understand differences in issue framing as relationally significant, sequentially relevant and discursively constructed incompatibilities between two or more issue elements. In the study of multi-stakeholder conversations in the context of natural resources management in Southern Ecuador, we analyzed 8 difference emergence episodes during three interaction moments. We show that the discursive structure of the difference-initiating speaking turns is multi-layered. The differences emerge by working cautiously towards a specific but clear challenge and then adding further challenging layers of implications, and can be understood as oriented to simultaneously being to the point and being relevant. As was the case in 4 of the studied difference emergence episodes, this multi-layered structure can be exploited by interrupting a divergent movement in order to prevent the emergence of a difference. Finally, the interaction contexts in which the differences emerge can be characterized as asymmetrical, putting the burden of the risky business of initiating differences on the shoulders of the weaker parties, who proceed very prudently and produce generally weak signals of difference.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 2007
EventThe International Association for Conflict Management. 20th Annual Conference -
Duration: 1 Jul 20074 Jul 2007

Conference

ConferenceThe International Association for Conflict Management. 20th Annual Conference
Period1/07/074/07/07

Fingerprint

conversation
stakeholder
incompatibility
Ecuador
interaction
speaking
natural resources
management

Cite this

Dewulf, A., & Bouwen, R. (2007). 'Doing differences': the emergence of differences in issue framing in multi-actor conversations. Paper presented at The International Association for Conflict Management. 20th Annual Conference, .
Dewulf, A. ; Bouwen, R. / 'Doing differences': the emergence of differences in issue framing in multi-actor conversations. Paper presented at The International Association for Conflict Management. 20th Annual Conference, .
@conference{ee7717e3bc6c4b129a3613fb8c938cd8,
title = "'Doing differences': the emergence of differences in issue framing in multi-actor conversations",
abstract = "In this paper we analyze how differences in issue framing emerge in multi-stakeholder conversations. From a discursive approach to issue framing we draw on conversational studies of disagreement, difference and conflict to build up a theoretical framework. This leads us to understand differences in issue framing as relationally significant, sequentially relevant and discursively constructed incompatibilities between two or more issue elements. In the study of multi-stakeholder conversations in the context of natural resources management in Southern Ecuador, we analyzed 8 difference emergence episodes during three interaction moments. We show that the discursive structure of the difference-initiating speaking turns is multi-layered. The differences emerge by working cautiously towards a specific but clear challenge and then adding further challenging layers of implications, and can be understood as oriented to simultaneously being to the point and being relevant. As was the case in 4 of the studied difference emergence episodes, this multi-layered structure can be exploited by interrupting a divergent movement in order to prevent the emergence of a difference. Finally, the interaction contexts in which the differences emerge can be characterized as asymmetrical, putting the burden of the risky business of initiating differences on the shoulders of the weaker parties, who proceed very prudently and produce generally weak signals of difference.",
author = "A. Dewulf and R. Bouwen",
note = "WoS; The International Association for Conflict Management. 20th Annual Conference ; Conference date: 01-07-2007 Through 04-07-2007",
year = "2007",
language = "English",

}

Dewulf, A & Bouwen, R 2007, ''Doing differences': the emergence of differences in issue framing in multi-actor conversations' Paper presented at The International Association for Conflict Management. 20th Annual Conference, 1/07/07 - 4/07/07, .

'Doing differences': the emergence of differences in issue framing in multi-actor conversations. / Dewulf, A.; Bouwen, R.

2007. Paper presented at The International Association for Conflict Management. 20th Annual Conference, .

Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference paperAcademicpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - 'Doing differences': the emergence of differences in issue framing in multi-actor conversations

AU - Dewulf, A.

AU - Bouwen, R.

N1 - WoS

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - In this paper we analyze how differences in issue framing emerge in multi-stakeholder conversations. From a discursive approach to issue framing we draw on conversational studies of disagreement, difference and conflict to build up a theoretical framework. This leads us to understand differences in issue framing as relationally significant, sequentially relevant and discursively constructed incompatibilities between two or more issue elements. In the study of multi-stakeholder conversations in the context of natural resources management in Southern Ecuador, we analyzed 8 difference emergence episodes during three interaction moments. We show that the discursive structure of the difference-initiating speaking turns is multi-layered. The differences emerge by working cautiously towards a specific but clear challenge and then adding further challenging layers of implications, and can be understood as oriented to simultaneously being to the point and being relevant. As was the case in 4 of the studied difference emergence episodes, this multi-layered structure can be exploited by interrupting a divergent movement in order to prevent the emergence of a difference. Finally, the interaction contexts in which the differences emerge can be characterized as asymmetrical, putting the burden of the risky business of initiating differences on the shoulders of the weaker parties, who proceed very prudently and produce generally weak signals of difference.

AB - In this paper we analyze how differences in issue framing emerge in multi-stakeholder conversations. From a discursive approach to issue framing we draw on conversational studies of disagreement, difference and conflict to build up a theoretical framework. This leads us to understand differences in issue framing as relationally significant, sequentially relevant and discursively constructed incompatibilities between two or more issue elements. In the study of multi-stakeholder conversations in the context of natural resources management in Southern Ecuador, we analyzed 8 difference emergence episodes during three interaction moments. We show that the discursive structure of the difference-initiating speaking turns is multi-layered. The differences emerge by working cautiously towards a specific but clear challenge and then adding further challenging layers of implications, and can be understood as oriented to simultaneously being to the point and being relevant. As was the case in 4 of the studied difference emergence episodes, this multi-layered structure can be exploited by interrupting a divergent movement in order to prevent the emergence of a difference. Finally, the interaction contexts in which the differences emerge can be characterized as asymmetrical, putting the burden of the risky business of initiating differences on the shoulders of the weaker parties, who proceed very prudently and produce generally weak signals of difference.

M3 - Conference paper

ER -

Dewulf A, Bouwen R. 'Doing differences': the emergence of differences in issue framing in multi-actor conversations. 2007. Paper presented at The International Association for Conflict Management. 20th Annual Conference, .