Does local ownership bring about effectiveness? The case of a transnational advocacy network

B. Arensman*, M.G.J. van Wessel, D.J.M. Hilhorst

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In international development, shared ownership is assumed to be a condition for effectiveness. Academic studies question this relation, claiming shared ownership can instead lead to ineffectiveness. This study analysed the interplay between ownership and effectiveness in a transnational advocacy network for conflict prevention observed 2012–2015. Building on recent discussions about balancing unity and diversity in networks, this article unpacks the ownership/effectiveness relationship into three dimensions: collective identity, accountability processes and a shared advocacy message. We find that the question is not about more or less effectiveness, but about the processes shaping the meaning of effectiveness in particular institutional constellations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1310-1326
JournalThird World Quarterly
Volume38
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • advocacy
  • development
  • effectiveness
  • networks
  • Ownership
  • politics of effectiveness
  • transnational advocacy networks

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does local ownership bring about effectiveness? The case of a transnational advocacy network'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this