Does Adaptive Collaborative Forest Governance Affect Poverty? Participatory Action Research in Nepal's Community Forests

C.L. McDougall, J.L.S. Jiggins, B. Hari Pandit, S.K. Thapa Magar Rana, C. Leeuwis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite recognition of forests’ roles in rural livelihoods, there has been relatively little empirical exploration of community forestry’s contribution to poverty alleviation. Similarly, there has been little study of the interaction of social learning-based approaches to forest governance with poverty alleviation. This article draws on 6 years of research on community forestry in Nepal to explore whether, and how, adaptive collaborative forest governance influences the financial and forest assets of women and the poor. The study includes impacts on income generation, access to micro-credit, and employment. The findings indicate that the financial and forest assets of both women and the poor—and especially poor women—increased as a result of adaptive collaborative forest governance. They also suggest a strong role for social learning in poverty alleviation. The article concludes by considering whether poverty alleviation might usefully be reconceptualized as a power-related transformation process.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1235-1251
JournalSociety & Natural Resources
Volume26
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Keywords

  • adaptive collaborative governance
  • equity
  • gender
  • livelihoods
  • Nepal
  • power
  • social learning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does Adaptive Collaborative Forest Governance Affect Poverty? Participatory Action Research in Nepal's Community Forests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this