Abstract
Convergence–as an objective and as a process–designates the coming together of different social actors across strategic, political, ideological, sectoral and geographic divides. In this paper, we analyze the global food sovereignty movement (GFSM) as a convergence space, with a focus on constituencies and quotas as tools to maintain diversity while facilitating convergence. We show how the use of constituencies and quotas has supported two objectives of the GFSM: alliances building and effective direct representation in global policy-making spaces. We conclude by pointing to some convergence challenges the GFSM faces as it expands beyond its agrarian origins.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1477-1498 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Journal of Peasant Studies |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| Early online date | 5 Oct 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2019 |
Keywords
- Alliance building
- constituencies
- convergence space
- food sovereignty
- global governance
- quotas
- representation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Do we need to categorize it? Reflections on constituencies and quotas as tools for negotiating difference in the global food sovereignty convergence space'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver