Do Elections Cause Military Spending to Go Up or Down? New International Evidence

Jeroen Klomp*, Jakob de Haan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This study explores whether the level of military expenditures is affected by the occurrence of elections. From a theoretical perspective, it is not immediately clear whether, and if so, in which direction, upcoming elections shift military expenditures. On the one hand, the incumbent may try to enhance the likelihood of being re-elected by supporting the domestic defense industry. On the other hand, it might be more attractive to cut defense spending and increase non-defense spending. It is also possible that both effects coexist. We therefore apply the finite mixture model (FMM), which is able to test competing hypotheses. Our results, based on a panel of 93 democratic countries between 1980 and 2018 and Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) data on military spending, yield support for both hypotheses. Countries facing security risks or having a significant defense industry are most likely to expand their defense spending in an election year, while other countries are more likely to reduce their defense expenditure.

Original languageEnglish
JournalArmed Forces and Society
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2 May 2024

Keywords

  • finite mixture models
  • military spending
  • non-military government spending
  • political budget cycles

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do Elections Cause Military Spending to Go Up or Down? New International Evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this