TY - JOUR
T1 - Diversity in smallholder farms growing coffee and their use of recommended coffee management practices in Uganda
AU - Bongers, G.
AU - Fleskens, L.
AU - van de Ven, G.W.J.
AU - Mukasa, D.
AU - Giller, K.E.
AU - van Asten, P.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Many smallholder farm systems in Uganda produce coffee as an important cash crop. Yet coffee yields are
poor. To increase farmers’ production, a range of agronomic practices have been recommended by national
and international agencies. Yet the adoption potential of recommendations differs between farm systems.
To understand the differences in adoption potential of recommended coffee management practices in
Uganda, we provide a typology of farm systems with coffee, assess the diversity between the farm types,
and evaluate the current use of existing management recommendations for each farm type. Through
factor analysis and cluster analysis of farms producing coffee, we identified five farm types: large coffee
farms, farms with off-farm activities, coffee-dependent farms, diversified farms, and banana–coffee farms.
The farm types were based on differences in size, and on the relative contributions of coffee, banana and
off-farm labour to total household income. They also differ in the availability of the resources labour, land
and cash, in coffee production and revenue, and in current use of most recommended practices. Qualitative
analysis indicates that farm types have different constraints and opportunities to adopt recommendations.
Our results highlight that an analysis of different farmsystems with coffee production, a degree of definition
beyond the ‘smallholder coffee farmer’ as a homogenous entity, is important in order to understand the
scope for success or failure of recommended practices.
AB - Many smallholder farm systems in Uganda produce coffee as an important cash crop. Yet coffee yields are
poor. To increase farmers’ production, a range of agronomic practices have been recommended by national
and international agencies. Yet the adoption potential of recommendations differs between farm systems.
To understand the differences in adoption potential of recommended coffee management practices in
Uganda, we provide a typology of farm systems with coffee, assess the diversity between the farm types,
and evaluate the current use of existing management recommendations for each farm type. Through
factor analysis and cluster analysis of farms producing coffee, we identified five farm types: large coffee
farms, farms with off-farm activities, coffee-dependent farms, diversified farms, and banana–coffee farms.
The farm types were based on differences in size, and on the relative contributions of coffee, banana and
off-farm labour to total household income. They also differ in the availability of the resources labour, land
and cash, in coffee production and revenue, and in current use of most recommended practices. Qualitative
analysis indicates that farm types have different constraints and opportunities to adopt recommendations.
Our results highlight that an analysis of different farmsystems with coffee production, a degree of definition
beyond the ‘smallholder coffee farmer’ as a homogenous entity, is important in order to understand the
scope for success or failure of recommended practices.
U2 - 10.1017/S0014479714000490
DO - 10.1017/S0014479714000490
M3 - Article
SN - 0014-4797
VL - 51
SP - 594
EP - 614
JO - Experimental Agriculture
JF - Experimental Agriculture
IS - 04
ER -