Divergent framing: The public debate on migration in the Dutch parliament and media, 1995-2004

Conny Roggeband, Rens Vliegenthart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

113 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article we reconstruct how the issues of migration and integration have been framed in the Dutch public debate over the last decade. We examine the patterns in both the parliamentary arena and the media and look at similarities and differences between them. On the basis of two contradictory theories, we formulate hypotheses about overlap and differences between the two arenas and diversity within them. Our results reveal incongruence in framing between them. After 9/ 11, however, the framing in which Islam is perceived as a threat to Western society becomes dominant in both arenas. Furthermore, we do not find any proof of the idea that the media act as a civic forum, with a high diversity of framing. Framing in parliament, instead, is far more diverse. In contrast to the hegemonic framing in the media, the Islam-as-threat frame is actively contested in the political realm.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)524-548
Number of pages25
JournalWest European Politics
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2007

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Divergent framing: The public debate on migration in the Dutch parliament and media, 1995-2004'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this