Discrepancy between snack choice intentions and behavior

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To investigate dietary constructs that affect the discrepancy between intentioned and actual snack choice. Design Participants indicated their intentioned snack choice from a set of 4 snacks (2 healthful, 2 unhealthful). One week later, they actually chose a snack from the same set. Within 1 week after the actual choice, they completed a questionnaire that evaluated several dietary constructs. Setting Worksite cafeterias. Participants Office employees in the Netherlands (N = 585, 65% male, mean age 39.6 years [standard deviation = 9.2], 83% highly educated). Main Outcome Measures Snack choice intentions and actual snack choices (healthful vs unhealthful). Demographic and dietary constructs. Analysis Student t tests, chi-square tests, and logistic regression (P <.05). Results Forty-nine percent of the participants (n = 285) intended to choose a healthful snack. Of this group, 27% (n = 78) chose an unhealthful snack instead. Ninety-two percent (n = 276) of the unhealthful intenders did indeed choose an unhealthful snack. None of the dietary constructs significantly predicted the failure to enact a healthful snack choice intention. Conclusions and Implications Although a substantial discrepancy between healthful intentions and actual snack choice was demonstrated, the evaluated constructs do not adequately measure the psychological process by which intention is converted into practice. Further studies are required to further investigate this process.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)311-316
JournalJournal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Volume40
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Keywords

  • planned behavior
  • vegetable consumption
  • eating behavior
  • self-efficacy
  • decisions
  • attitudes
  • healthy
  • humans

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Discrepancy between snack choice intentions and behavior'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this