Discourse analysis of environmental policy revisited: traditions, trends, perspectives

Introduction

Sina Leipold, P.H. Feindt, Georg Winkel, R. Keller

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialAcademic

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the mid-1990s, discourse analysis has become an increasingly established framework in environmental policy analysis. The field has diversified in terms of conceptual approaches, methods, topics, and geographies. This special issue revisits trends and traditions regarding theoretical and methodological approaches, ‘old’ and ‘new’ discourses, and our knowledge about discursive effects. We contextualize and discuss the twelve contributions to this special issue against the broader trajectory of the field over the past 25 years. Our analysis reveals an abundance of theoretical approaches with limited cross-fertilization, a plethora of rich case studies but few attempts at meta-analysis, and subtle accounts of discursive effects on discourse, policy and practice without an overarching framework. We suggest seven directions for the field’s future evolution: a need for more comparative and multiple-case studies, theoretical cross-fertilization, pro-active integration of non-English-speaking research contexts, development of methodological capabilities to capture discursive developments across larger numbers of publics and policy arenas, a more explicit conceptualization of agency, power and materiality, a stronger collaboration with transdisciplinary approaches, and a reflexive engagement with the ‘critical’ ambition of discourse analysis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)445-463
JournalJournal of Environmental Policy and Planning
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

environmental policy
policy analysis
meta-analysis
theoretical study
trajectory
trend
analysis
policy
effect

Cite this

@article{a5e22052c531435f9f7fb5fd34b5bd33,
title = "Discourse analysis of environmental policy revisited: traditions, trends, perspectives: Introduction",
abstract = "Since the mid-1990s, discourse analysis has become an increasingly established framework in environmental policy analysis. The field has diversified in terms of conceptual approaches, methods, topics, and geographies. This special issue revisits trends and traditions regarding theoretical and methodological approaches, ‘old’ and ‘new’ discourses, and our knowledge about discursive effects. We contextualize and discuss the twelve contributions to this special issue against the broader trajectory of the field over the past 25 years. Our analysis reveals an abundance of theoretical approaches with limited cross-fertilization, a plethora of rich case studies but few attempts at meta-analysis, and subtle accounts of discursive effects on discourse, policy and practice without an overarching framework. We suggest seven directions for the field’s future evolution: a need for more comparative and multiple-case studies, theoretical cross-fertilization, pro-active integration of non-English-speaking research contexts, development of methodological capabilities to capture discursive developments across larger numbers of publics and policy arenas, a more explicit conceptualization of agency, power and materiality, a stronger collaboration with transdisciplinary approaches, and a reflexive engagement with the ‘critical’ ambition of discourse analysis.",
author = "Sina Leipold and P.H. Feindt and Georg Winkel and R. Keller",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1080/1523908X.2019.1660462",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "445--463",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning",
issn = "1523-908X",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "5",

}

Discourse analysis of environmental policy revisited: traditions, trends, perspectives : Introduction. / Leipold, Sina; Feindt, P.H.; Winkel, Georg; Keller, R.

In: Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, Vol. 21, No. 5, 10.09.2019, p. 445-463.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialAcademic

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discourse analysis of environmental policy revisited: traditions, trends, perspectives

T2 - Introduction

AU - Leipold, Sina

AU - Feindt, P.H.

AU - Winkel, Georg

AU - Keller, R.

PY - 2019/9/10

Y1 - 2019/9/10

N2 - Since the mid-1990s, discourse analysis has become an increasingly established framework in environmental policy analysis. The field has diversified in terms of conceptual approaches, methods, topics, and geographies. This special issue revisits trends and traditions regarding theoretical and methodological approaches, ‘old’ and ‘new’ discourses, and our knowledge about discursive effects. We contextualize and discuss the twelve contributions to this special issue against the broader trajectory of the field over the past 25 years. Our analysis reveals an abundance of theoretical approaches with limited cross-fertilization, a plethora of rich case studies but few attempts at meta-analysis, and subtle accounts of discursive effects on discourse, policy and practice without an overarching framework. We suggest seven directions for the field’s future evolution: a need for more comparative and multiple-case studies, theoretical cross-fertilization, pro-active integration of non-English-speaking research contexts, development of methodological capabilities to capture discursive developments across larger numbers of publics and policy arenas, a more explicit conceptualization of agency, power and materiality, a stronger collaboration with transdisciplinary approaches, and a reflexive engagement with the ‘critical’ ambition of discourse analysis.

AB - Since the mid-1990s, discourse analysis has become an increasingly established framework in environmental policy analysis. The field has diversified in terms of conceptual approaches, methods, topics, and geographies. This special issue revisits trends and traditions regarding theoretical and methodological approaches, ‘old’ and ‘new’ discourses, and our knowledge about discursive effects. We contextualize and discuss the twelve contributions to this special issue against the broader trajectory of the field over the past 25 years. Our analysis reveals an abundance of theoretical approaches with limited cross-fertilization, a plethora of rich case studies but few attempts at meta-analysis, and subtle accounts of discursive effects on discourse, policy and practice without an overarching framework. We suggest seven directions for the field’s future evolution: a need for more comparative and multiple-case studies, theoretical cross-fertilization, pro-active integration of non-English-speaking research contexts, development of methodological capabilities to capture discursive developments across larger numbers of publics and policy arenas, a more explicit conceptualization of agency, power and materiality, a stronger collaboration with transdisciplinary approaches, and a reflexive engagement with the ‘critical’ ambition of discourse analysis.

U2 - 10.1080/1523908X.2019.1660462

DO - 10.1080/1523908X.2019.1660462

M3 - Editorial

VL - 21

SP - 445

EP - 463

JO - Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning

JF - Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning

SN - 1523-908X

IS - 5

ER -