Disclosing or obscuring? The politics of transparency in global climate governance

Aarti Gupta*, Michael Mason

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Transparency is increasingly evoked within public and private climate governance arrangements as a key means to enhance accountability and improve environmental outcomes. We review assumed links between transparency, accountability and environmental sustainability here, by identifying four rationales underpinning uptake of transparency in governance. We label these democratization, technocratization, marketization and privatization, and assess how they shape the scope and practices of climate disclosure, and to what effect. We find that all four are discernible in climate governance, yet the technocratic and privatization rationales tend to overtake the originally intended (more inclusive, and more public-good oriented) democratization and marketization rationales for transparency, particularly during institutionalization of disclosure systems. This reduces transparency's potential to enhance accountability or trigger more environmentally sustainable outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)82-90
JournalCurrent Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Volume18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2016

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Disclosing or obscuring? The politics of transparency in global climate governance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this