Differential response by males and females to manipulation of partner contribution in the great tit (Parus major)

J.J. Sanz, S. Kranenbarg, J.M. Tinbergen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

148 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

1. In birds with bi-parental care, handicapping is often assumed to decrease the amount of parental care of the handicapped partner. We discuss how handicapping could alter the shape of the handicapped bird's survival-effort curve (theoretical curve relating the survival of a parent to its effort) and show that the optimal response could yield a decrease, no response or even an increase in effort of the handicapped bird. 2. Male or female great tits Parus major (L.) were handicapped during the nestling period by clipping a number of feathers in order to study the effects on parental care and body condition. 3. Handicapped males significantly decreased their feeding rates, while handicapped females did not. Condition of handicapped females significantly deteriorated, while condition of handicapped males did not change during the experiment. Females with a handicapped partner fully compensated for their partner's decrease in work rate, while males with a handicapped partner did not show any compensation and even tended to decrease their feeding rates. 4. Using an inverse optimality approach, we reconstructed the theoretical curve relating the survival of a parent to its effort on the basis of the experimental effects. The handicapped male's survival-effort curve appeared to be slightly steeper than that of handicapped females. This suggests that handicapped males suffer more from an increase in effort than handicapped females.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)74-85
JournalJournal of Animal Ecology
Volume69
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Differential response by males and females to manipulation of partner contribution in the great tit (Parus major)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this