Different landscape features within a simplified agroecosystem support diverse pollinators and their service to crop plants

Thijs P.M. Fijen*, Samantha F.J. Read, Melanie K. Walker, Megan Gee, Warrick R. Nelson, Brad G. Howlett

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: Landscape simplification is a main driver of insect decline, threatening crop pollination services. Changes in functional features in simplified agroecosystems may impact the abundance of wild pollinators. Objectives: Here, we studied whether different pollinator groups based on life-history are differentially associated to landscape features, and how this affects crop pollination service delivery. Methods: Using window traps in a highly simplified agroecosystem, we surveyed pollinator abundances and diversity associated with: (1) bare fence-lines separating pastures (control), (2) conifer hedgerows (3) farm gardens of diverse exotic plant species (4) effluent-ponds, (5) newly established native-plantings, (6) gorse (Ulex europaeus) hedgerows and (7) open water channels across six to twelve dairy farms. We also measured pollination service delivery to potted pak choi (Brassica rapa) plots near features 1–5 on six farms. Results: Pollinators at gardens, native-plantings, and effluent-ponds delivered significantly more pollination service than at bare fence-lines, with flies being more effective pollinators than bees at all features assessed. Taxa delivering the service also differed across features. The native bee Lasioglossum sordidum delivered more pollination at garden and native-planting features than at other features, drone flies (Eristalis tenax) contributed the majority of pollination service at effluent-ponds and bare fence-lines, while calliphorid flies contributed most pollination at conifer hedgerows. Conclusions: Conversion of functional features to bare fence-lines negatively affects on-farm pollinator diversity and its service to crop plants. However, farmers can benefit from enhancing features containing diverse plant species that support non-bee and bee species proven to deliver measurable crop pollination services.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1787-1799
JournalLandscape Ecology
Volume37
Issue number7
Early online date23 Mar 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2022

Keywords

  • Crop pollination
  • Landscape features
  • Non-bee pollinators
  • Pollen deposition
  • Pollinator abundance and diversity
  • Wild pollinators

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Different landscape features within a simplified agroecosystem support diverse pollinators and their service to crop plants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this