Developing climate information portals with users

Promises and pitfalls

R.J. Swart*, K. de Bruin, S. Dhenain, G. Dubois, Annemarie Groot, E. von der Forst

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The priority of climate change on political and research agendas fluctuates but got a recent boost after the 2015 UNFCCC Paris Agreement. The amount of climate data is surging and so is the number of climate information portals.

Portal developers usually aim at serving ‘‘users” and therefore consult them. But how useful are the resulting portals really? And for whom? How effective was the involvement of users in developing the portal?

This paper aims to provide some answers to these questions.

Reflections which have been carried out in this paper are based on the situation in Europe, building on experience in a number of European projects, in particular the CLIPC project (Climate Information Portal for Copernicus), a ‘‘pre-operational” research project for Copernicus.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)12-22
JournalClimate Services
Volume6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

climate
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
climate change
project
research project
Europe

Cite this

@article{9f1e91f8532648f4ba923f535d0db73c,
title = "Developing climate information portals with users: Promises and pitfalls",
abstract = "The priority of climate change on political and research agendas fluctuates but got a recent boost after the 2015 UNFCCC Paris Agreement. The amount of climate data is surging and so is the number of climate information portals.Portal developers usually aim at serving ‘‘users” and therefore consult them. But how useful are the resulting portals really? And for whom? How effective was the involvement of users in developing the portal?This paper aims to provide some answers to these questions.Reflections which have been carried out in this paper are based on the situation in Europe, building on experience in a number of European projects, in particular the CLIPC project (Climate Information Portal for Copernicus), a ‘‘pre-operational” research project for Copernicus.",
author = "R.J. Swart and {de Bruin}, K. and S. Dhenain and G. Dubois and Annemarie Groot and {von der Forst}, E.",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.cliser.2017.06.008",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "12--22",
journal = "Climate Services",
issn = "2405-8807",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Developing climate information portals with users : Promises and pitfalls. / Swart, R.J.; de Bruin, K.; Dhenain, S.; Dubois, G.; Groot, Annemarie; von der Forst, E.

In: Climate Services, Vol. 6, 2017, p. 12-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing climate information portals with users

T2 - Promises and pitfalls

AU - Swart, R.J.

AU - de Bruin, K.

AU - Dhenain, S.

AU - Dubois, G.

AU - Groot, Annemarie

AU - von der Forst, E.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The priority of climate change on political and research agendas fluctuates but got a recent boost after the 2015 UNFCCC Paris Agreement. The amount of climate data is surging and so is the number of climate information portals.Portal developers usually aim at serving ‘‘users” and therefore consult them. But how useful are the resulting portals really? And for whom? How effective was the involvement of users in developing the portal?This paper aims to provide some answers to these questions.Reflections which have been carried out in this paper are based on the situation in Europe, building on experience in a number of European projects, in particular the CLIPC project (Climate Information Portal for Copernicus), a ‘‘pre-operational” research project for Copernicus.

AB - The priority of climate change on political and research agendas fluctuates but got a recent boost after the 2015 UNFCCC Paris Agreement. The amount of climate data is surging and so is the number of climate information portals.Portal developers usually aim at serving ‘‘users” and therefore consult them. But how useful are the resulting portals really? And for whom? How effective was the involvement of users in developing the portal?This paper aims to provide some answers to these questions.Reflections which have been carried out in this paper are based on the situation in Europe, building on experience in a number of European projects, in particular the CLIPC project (Climate Information Portal for Copernicus), a ‘‘pre-operational” research project for Copernicus.

U2 - 10.1016/j.cliser.2017.06.008

DO - 10.1016/j.cliser.2017.06.008

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 12

EP - 22

JO - Climate Services

JF - Climate Services

SN - 2405-8807

ER -