Designer ecosystems: A solution for the conservation-exploitation dilemma

Ashutosh Awasthi*, Kripal Singh, Audrey O'Grady, Ronan Courtney, Alok Kalra, Rana Pratap Singh, Artemio Cerda Bolinches, Yosef Steinberger, D.D. Patra

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Increase in human population is accelerating the rate of land use change, biodiversity loss and habitat degradation, triggering a serious threat to life supporting ecosystem services. Existing strategies for biological conservation remain insufficient to achieve a sustainable human-nature relationship and this situation has fueled a debate on the conservation-exploitation dilemma. We need to devise novel strategies, in a mutually inclusive way, which can support biological conservation and secure economic development of deprived populations. Here we propose the use of designer ecosystems which can ensure ecological sustainability while providing ample and some new means of livelihood to local people. Such designer ecosystems may provide a solution to the conservation-exploitation dilemma through lessening population pressure on conserved ecosystems and remediating environmental pollution and ecosystem degradation to secure a broad range of ecosystem services of economic and cultural values.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-75
JournalEcological Engineering
Volume93
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Biodiversity
  • Community
  • Conservation
  • Ecosystem
  • Exotic invasion
  • Restoration
  • Sustainability

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Designer ecosystems: A solution for the conservation-exploitation dilemma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Awasthi, A., Singh, K., O'Grady, A., Courtney, R., Kalra, A., Singh, R. P., Cerda Bolinches, A., Steinberger, Y., & Patra, D. D. (2016). Designer ecosystems: A solution for the conservation-exploitation dilemma. Ecological Engineering, 93, 73-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.05.010