Defining Nature

Hans Keune, M. Immovilli, Roger Keller, Simone Maynard, Pamela McElwee, Zsolt Molnár, Gunilla A. Olsson, Unnikrishnan Payyappallimana, Anik Schneiders, Machteld Schoolenberg, Suneetha M. Subramanian, Wouter van Reeth

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In any attempt to “rethink” biodiversity governance, we need to consider that defining nature (and related concepts such as biodiversity, ecosystems, landscapes or green infrastructure) is not merely an objective scientific exercise. In reality, context-specific, subjective, normative and dynamic worldviews and values are at play in any definition of nature, whether explicitly or implicitly. Being aware of this pluralism is essential for avoiding “objective” definitional attitudes that risk disregarding and marginalizing the plurality of values and worldviews connected to different definitions of nature. In fact, paternalistic positions can create breeding grounds for fruitless dialogues between stakeholders, and thus pluralistic approaches help open up spaces for discussion.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTransforming Biodiversity Governance
EditorsIngrid J. Visseren-Hamakers, Marcel T.J. Kok
PublisherCambridge University Press
Chapter2
Pages25-42
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9781108856348
Publication statusPublished - 26 May 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Defining Nature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this