Decision support for participatory wetland decision-making

H. Goosen, R.H.H. Janssen, J.E. Vermaat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Decision support systems can be helpful tools in wetland planning and management. Decision support systems can contribute to efficient exchange of information between experts, stakeholders, decision makers and laypeople. However, the achievements of decision support systems are repeatedly being reported as modest. The objective of this article is to specify the roles and requirements of decision support tools in wetland planning. Why do such tools often fail and how can they be improved? Too often, systems are developed from a technological developers¿ push (supply-driven) rather than through a demand-driven process where the need for certain technologies to effectively support decision processes is being specified. It is questioned whether (often technocratic) tools are still equipped to support the complex planning and management process where different stakeholders interact. Two tools are described, which have been developed to facilitate negotiations in wetland planning and both tend to be less data-driven and more directed to play a role in participatory processes. From experiences with the development of the two decision support efforts we derive suggestions for improvement. The first tool uses spatial multi-criteria analysis techniques, to enable a structured analysis of the diversity of the water management issues. The second tool focuses on interactive design and spatial negotiation. It is concluded that application of this category of tools can be promising in early phases of decision-making. Their main contribution is to help to overcome unnecessary conflicts, to stimulate collaborative planning, to structure the problem and to provide insight in values and preferences of stakeholders involved
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-199
JournalEcological Engineering
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Wetlands
Decision making
wetland
decision making
decision support system
stakeholder
Planning
Decision support systems
tool use
water management
decision
planning
Water management
analysis

Keywords

  • peat grasslands
  • land use planning
  • decision support systems
  • water management
  • resource-management
  • land-use
  • netherlands
  • information
  • mediation
  • ecology
  • systems
  • tools
  • gis

Cite this

Goosen, H. ; Janssen, R.H.H. ; Vermaat, J.E. / Decision support for participatory wetland decision-making. In: Ecological Engineering. 2007 ; Vol. 30, No. 2. pp. 187-199.
@article{3d71c148b0e840db92979c527034c0e7,
title = "Decision support for participatory wetland decision-making",
abstract = "Decision support systems can be helpful tools in wetland planning and management. Decision support systems can contribute to efficient exchange of information between experts, stakeholders, decision makers and laypeople. However, the achievements of decision support systems are repeatedly being reported as modest. The objective of this article is to specify the roles and requirements of decision support tools in wetland planning. Why do such tools often fail and how can they be improved? Too often, systems are developed from a technological developers¿ push (supply-driven) rather than through a demand-driven process where the need for certain technologies to effectively support decision processes is being specified. It is questioned whether (often technocratic) tools are still equipped to support the complex planning and management process where different stakeholders interact. Two tools are described, which have been developed to facilitate negotiations in wetland planning and both tend to be less data-driven and more directed to play a role in participatory processes. From experiences with the development of the two decision support efforts we derive suggestions for improvement. The first tool uses spatial multi-criteria analysis techniques, to enable a structured analysis of the diversity of the water management issues. The second tool focuses on interactive design and spatial negotiation. It is concluded that application of this category of tools can be promising in early phases of decision-making. Their main contribution is to help to overcome unnecessary conflicts, to stimulate collaborative planning, to structure the problem and to provide insight in values and preferences of stakeholders involved",
keywords = "veenweiden, landgebruiksplanning, beslissingsondersteunende systemen, peat grasslands, land use planning, decision support systems, water management, resource-management, land-use, netherlands, information, mediation, ecology, systems, tools, gis",
author = "H. Goosen and R.H.H. Janssen and J.E. Vermaat",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.11.004",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "187--199",
journal = "Ecological Engineering",
issn = "0925-8574",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

Decision support for participatory wetland decision-making. / Goosen, H.; Janssen, R.H.H.; Vermaat, J.E.

In: Ecological Engineering, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2007, p. 187-199.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decision support for participatory wetland decision-making

AU - Goosen, H.

AU - Janssen, R.H.H.

AU - Vermaat, J.E.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Decision support systems can be helpful tools in wetland planning and management. Decision support systems can contribute to efficient exchange of information between experts, stakeholders, decision makers and laypeople. However, the achievements of decision support systems are repeatedly being reported as modest. The objective of this article is to specify the roles and requirements of decision support tools in wetland planning. Why do such tools often fail and how can they be improved? Too often, systems are developed from a technological developers¿ push (supply-driven) rather than through a demand-driven process where the need for certain technologies to effectively support decision processes is being specified. It is questioned whether (often technocratic) tools are still equipped to support the complex planning and management process where different stakeholders interact. Two tools are described, which have been developed to facilitate negotiations in wetland planning and both tend to be less data-driven and more directed to play a role in participatory processes. From experiences with the development of the two decision support efforts we derive suggestions for improvement. The first tool uses spatial multi-criteria analysis techniques, to enable a structured analysis of the diversity of the water management issues. The second tool focuses on interactive design and spatial negotiation. It is concluded that application of this category of tools can be promising in early phases of decision-making. Their main contribution is to help to overcome unnecessary conflicts, to stimulate collaborative planning, to structure the problem and to provide insight in values and preferences of stakeholders involved

AB - Decision support systems can be helpful tools in wetland planning and management. Decision support systems can contribute to efficient exchange of information between experts, stakeholders, decision makers and laypeople. However, the achievements of decision support systems are repeatedly being reported as modest. The objective of this article is to specify the roles and requirements of decision support tools in wetland planning. Why do such tools often fail and how can they be improved? Too often, systems are developed from a technological developers¿ push (supply-driven) rather than through a demand-driven process where the need for certain technologies to effectively support decision processes is being specified. It is questioned whether (often technocratic) tools are still equipped to support the complex planning and management process where different stakeholders interact. Two tools are described, which have been developed to facilitate negotiations in wetland planning and both tend to be less data-driven and more directed to play a role in participatory processes. From experiences with the development of the two decision support efforts we derive suggestions for improvement. The first tool uses spatial multi-criteria analysis techniques, to enable a structured analysis of the diversity of the water management issues. The second tool focuses on interactive design and spatial negotiation. It is concluded that application of this category of tools can be promising in early phases of decision-making. Their main contribution is to help to overcome unnecessary conflicts, to stimulate collaborative planning, to structure the problem and to provide insight in values and preferences of stakeholders involved

KW - veenweiden

KW - landgebruiksplanning

KW - beslissingsondersteunende systemen

KW - peat grasslands

KW - land use planning

KW - decision support systems

KW - water management

KW - resource-management

KW - land-use

KW - netherlands

KW - information

KW - mediation

KW - ecology

KW - systems

KW - tools

KW - gis

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.11.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.11.004

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 187

EP - 199

JO - Ecological Engineering

JF - Ecological Engineering

SN - 0925-8574

IS - 2

ER -