Debating the Precautionary Principle: "Guilty until Proven Innocent" or "Innocent until Proven Guilty"?

H. van den Belt

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › Academic › peer-review

88 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1122-1126
Journal	Plant Physiology
Volume	132
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.023531
Publication status	Published - 2003

Keywords

transgenic insecticidal corn
food

Access to Document

10.1104/pp.103.023531

Cite this

@article{07a5f4f718694fc5bb43d0ceb2b12078,

title = "Debating the Precautionary Principle: {"}Guilty until Proven Innocent{"} or {"}Innocent until Proven Guilty{"}?",

keywords = "transgenic insecticidal corn, food",

author = "{van den Belt}, H.",

year = "2003",

doi = "10.1104/pp.103.023531",

language = "English",

volume = "132",

pages = "1122--1126",

journal = "Plant Physiology",

issn = "0032-0889",

publisher = "American Society of Plant Biologists",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Debating the Precautionary Principle: "Guilty until Proven Innocent" or "Innocent until Proven Guilty"?

AU - van den Belt, H.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

KW - transgenic insecticidal corn

KW - food

U2 - 10.1104/pp.103.023531

DO - 10.1104/pp.103.023531

M3 - Editorial

VL - 132

SP - 1122

EP - 1126

JO - Plant Physiology

JF - Plant Physiology

SN - 0032-0889

IS - 3

ER -