Debating REDD+ and its implications: Reply to Angelsen et al.

Robert Fletcher^*, Wolfram Dressler, Bram Büscher, Zachary R. Anderson

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Access to Document

@article{721deac150ef49b0bf21c71e863cf891,

title = "Debating REDD+ and its implications: Reply to Angelsen et al.",

author = "Robert Fletcher and Wolfram Dressler and Bram B{\"u}scher and Anderson, {Zachary R.}",

year = "2017",

doi = "10.1111/cobi.12934",

language = "English",

volume = "31",

pages = "721--723",

journal = "Conservation Biology",

issn = "0888-8892",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Debating REDD+ and its implications

T2 - Reply to Angelsen et al.

AU - Fletcher, Robert

AU - Dressler, Wolfram

AU - Büscher, Bram

AU - Anderson, Zachary R.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

U2 - 10.1111/cobi.12934

DO - 10.1111/cobi.12934

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

AN - SCOPUS:85018266769

SN - 0888-8892

VL - 31

SP - 721

EP - 723

JO - Conservation Biology

JF - Conservation Biology

IS - 3

ER -