Debating REDD+ and its implications

Reply to Angelsen et al.

Robert Fletcher*, Wolfram Dressler, Bram Büscher, Zachary R. Anderson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)721-723
JournalConservation Biology
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Cite this

Fletcher, Robert ; Dressler, Wolfram ; Büscher, Bram ; Anderson, Zachary R. / Debating REDD+ and its implications : Reply to Angelsen et al. In: Conservation Biology. 2017 ; Vol. 31, No. 3. pp. 721-723.
@article{721deac150ef49b0bf21c71e863cf891,
title = "Debating REDD+ and its implications: Reply to Angelsen et al.",
author = "Robert Fletcher and Wolfram Dressler and Bram B{\"u}scher and Anderson, {Zachary R.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1111/cobi.12934",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "721--723",
journal = "Conservation Biology",
issn = "0888-8892",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "3",

}

Debating REDD+ and its implications : Reply to Angelsen et al. / Fletcher, Robert; Dressler, Wolfram; Büscher, Bram; Anderson, Zachary R.

In: Conservation Biology, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2017, p. 721-723.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Debating REDD+ and its implications

T2 - Reply to Angelsen et al.

AU - Fletcher, Robert

AU - Dressler, Wolfram

AU - Büscher, Bram

AU - Anderson, Zachary R.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

U2 - 10.1111/cobi.12934

DO - 10.1111/cobi.12934

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

VL - 31

SP - 721

EP - 723

JO - Conservation Biology

JF - Conservation Biology

SN - 0888-8892

IS - 3

ER -