Dealing with Too Little: The Direct Experience of Scarcity does not Affect Snack Intake

Sofie van Rongen*, Kirsten Verkooijen, Emely de Vet

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: The experience of scarcity provides an explanation for the relatively unhealthy diets of people with low income. Causal evidence for an effect of direct experiences of scarcity on eating behaviour is lacking. Methods: Two studies (N = 81, N = 115) tested and refined a self‐developed trade‐off task, in which participants' resources were restricted (scarcity condition) or unrestricted (no‐scarcity condition), for manipulating experiences of scarcity. Two further studies (N = 95, N = 122) were performed to test whether scarcity results in greater calorie consumption from snacks and lower self‐reported self‐regulation of eating. Results: The scarcity manipulation appeared successful. A significant main effect of scarcity on eating was not found; however, an interaction effect between hunger and scarcity bordered on significance, such that those in the scarcity condition consumed more calories under low hunger. In the second experiment, participants were instructed to eat prior to participation to lower their hunger level. No difference between conditions was found in calorie consumption and self‐regulation of eating. Conclusion: Although the trade‐off task appeared to evoke scarcity experiences, the present research could not support the notion that these result in unhealthier eating. A more nuanced view of the influence of scarcity on eating is needed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)459-483
JournalApplied Psychology : Health and Well-Being
Volume11
Issue number3
Early online date9 Apr 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

Fingerprint

Snacks
Eating
Hunger
Feeding Behavior
Diet
Research

Cite this

@article{d6c08b1cf2a84ec099ba973e8e805fa4,
title = "Dealing with Too Little: The Direct Experience of Scarcity does not Affect Snack Intake",
abstract = "Background: The experience of scarcity provides an explanation for the relatively unhealthy diets of people with low income. Causal evidence for an effect of direct experiences of scarcity on eating behaviour is lacking. Methods: Two studies (N = 81, N = 115) tested and refined a self‐developed trade‐off task, in which participants' resources were restricted (scarcity condition) or unrestricted (no‐scarcity condition), for manipulating experiences of scarcity. Two further studies (N = 95, N = 122) were performed to test whether scarcity results in greater calorie consumption from snacks and lower self‐reported self‐regulation of eating. Results: The scarcity manipulation appeared successful. A significant main effect of scarcity on eating was not found; however, an interaction effect between hunger and scarcity bordered on significance, such that those in the scarcity condition consumed more calories under low hunger. In the second experiment, participants were instructed to eat prior to participation to lower their hunger level. No difference between conditions was found in calorie consumption and self‐regulation of eating. Conclusion: Although the trade‐off task appeared to evoke scarcity experiences, the present research could not support the notion that these result in unhealthier eating. A more nuanced view of the influence of scarcity on eating is needed.",
author = "{van Rongen}, Sofie and Kirsten Verkooijen and {de Vet}, Emely",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/aphw.12163",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "459--483",
journal = "Applied Psychology : Health and Well-Being",
issn = "1758-0846",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "3",

}

Dealing with Too Little: The Direct Experience of Scarcity does not Affect Snack Intake. / van Rongen, Sofie; Verkooijen, Kirsten; de Vet, Emely.

In: Applied Psychology : Health and Well-Being, Vol. 11, No. 3, 11.2019, p. 459-483.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dealing with Too Little: The Direct Experience of Scarcity does not Affect Snack Intake

AU - van Rongen, Sofie

AU - Verkooijen, Kirsten

AU - de Vet, Emely

PY - 2019/11

Y1 - 2019/11

N2 - Background: The experience of scarcity provides an explanation for the relatively unhealthy diets of people with low income. Causal evidence for an effect of direct experiences of scarcity on eating behaviour is lacking. Methods: Two studies (N = 81, N = 115) tested and refined a self‐developed trade‐off task, in which participants' resources were restricted (scarcity condition) or unrestricted (no‐scarcity condition), for manipulating experiences of scarcity. Two further studies (N = 95, N = 122) were performed to test whether scarcity results in greater calorie consumption from snacks and lower self‐reported self‐regulation of eating. Results: The scarcity manipulation appeared successful. A significant main effect of scarcity on eating was not found; however, an interaction effect between hunger and scarcity bordered on significance, such that those in the scarcity condition consumed more calories under low hunger. In the second experiment, participants were instructed to eat prior to participation to lower their hunger level. No difference between conditions was found in calorie consumption and self‐regulation of eating. Conclusion: Although the trade‐off task appeared to evoke scarcity experiences, the present research could not support the notion that these result in unhealthier eating. A more nuanced view of the influence of scarcity on eating is needed.

AB - Background: The experience of scarcity provides an explanation for the relatively unhealthy diets of people with low income. Causal evidence for an effect of direct experiences of scarcity on eating behaviour is lacking. Methods: Two studies (N = 81, N = 115) tested and refined a self‐developed trade‐off task, in which participants' resources were restricted (scarcity condition) or unrestricted (no‐scarcity condition), for manipulating experiences of scarcity. Two further studies (N = 95, N = 122) were performed to test whether scarcity results in greater calorie consumption from snacks and lower self‐reported self‐regulation of eating. Results: The scarcity manipulation appeared successful. A significant main effect of scarcity on eating was not found; however, an interaction effect between hunger and scarcity bordered on significance, such that those in the scarcity condition consumed more calories under low hunger. In the second experiment, participants were instructed to eat prior to participation to lower their hunger level. No difference between conditions was found in calorie consumption and self‐regulation of eating. Conclusion: Although the trade‐off task appeared to evoke scarcity experiences, the present research could not support the notion that these result in unhealthier eating. A more nuanced view of the influence of scarcity on eating is needed.

U2 - 10.1111/aphw.12163

DO - 10.1111/aphw.12163

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 459

EP - 483

JO - Applied Psychology : Health and Well-Being

JF - Applied Psychology : Health and Well-Being

SN - 1758-0846

IS - 3

ER -