De facto governance: how authoritative assessments construct climate engineering as an object of governance

A. Gupta, Ina Möller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Analyses of climate engineering (CE) governance have accelerated in the last decade. A key claim is that CE remains a largely ungoverned space, with shared norms, institutional arrangements, and formal rules to regulate CE not yet present. In contrast, here it is argued that de facto governance of CE is underway, discernible in an ordering of this nascent field of inquiry by unacknowledged sources of steering. One key source of de facto governance is analyzed: high-level ‘authoritative assessments’ of CE. The focus is on how these assessments are constructing CE as an object of governance through demarcating and categorizing this emerging field of inquiry, and how this contributes to normalizing and institutionalizing CE research (and CE research communities). Scrutinizing the distinct nature and political implications of de facto governance, particularly of novel and speculative technological trajectories not yet subject to formal steering, remains a key task for governance scholars.
LanguageEnglish
Pages480-501
JournalEnvironmental Politics
Volume28
Issue number3
Early online date9 Apr 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019

Fingerprint

climate
governance
engineering
trajectory
present
community

Keywords

  • de facto governance
  • climate engineering
  • geoengineering
  • scientific assessments
  • carbon dioxide removal
  • solar radiation management

Cite this

@article{154cc5c0426c400083048469afcfe1f5,
title = "De facto governance: how authoritative assessments construct climate engineering as an object of governance",
abstract = "Analyses of climate engineering (CE) governance have accelerated in the last decade. A key claim is that CE remains a largely ungoverned space, with shared norms, institutional arrangements, and formal rules to regulate CE not yet present. In contrast, here it is argued that de facto governance of CE is underway, discernible in an ordering of this nascent field of inquiry by unacknowledged sources of steering. One key source of de facto governance is analyzed: high-level ‘authoritative assessments’ of CE. The focus is on how these assessments are constructing CE as an object of governance through demarcating and categorizing this emerging field of inquiry, and how this contributes to normalizing and institutionalizing CE research (and CE research communities). Scrutinizing the distinct nature and political implications of de facto governance, particularly of novel and speculative technological trajectories not yet subject to formal steering, remains a key task for governance scholars.",
keywords = "de facto governance, climate engineering, geoengineering, scientific assessments, carbon dioxide removal, solar radiation management",
author = "A. Gupta and Ina M{\"o}ller",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1080/09644016.2018.1452373",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "480--501",
journal = "Environmental Politics",
issn = "0964-4016",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

De facto governance: how authoritative assessments construct climate engineering as an object of governance. / Gupta, A.; Möller, Ina.

In: Environmental Politics, Vol. 28, No. 3, 03.2019, p. 480-501.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - De facto governance: how authoritative assessments construct climate engineering as an object of governance

AU - Gupta, A.

AU - Möller, Ina

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - Analyses of climate engineering (CE) governance have accelerated in the last decade. A key claim is that CE remains a largely ungoverned space, with shared norms, institutional arrangements, and formal rules to regulate CE not yet present. In contrast, here it is argued that de facto governance of CE is underway, discernible in an ordering of this nascent field of inquiry by unacknowledged sources of steering. One key source of de facto governance is analyzed: high-level ‘authoritative assessments’ of CE. The focus is on how these assessments are constructing CE as an object of governance through demarcating and categorizing this emerging field of inquiry, and how this contributes to normalizing and institutionalizing CE research (and CE research communities). Scrutinizing the distinct nature and political implications of de facto governance, particularly of novel and speculative technological trajectories not yet subject to formal steering, remains a key task for governance scholars.

AB - Analyses of climate engineering (CE) governance have accelerated in the last decade. A key claim is that CE remains a largely ungoverned space, with shared norms, institutional arrangements, and formal rules to regulate CE not yet present. In contrast, here it is argued that de facto governance of CE is underway, discernible in an ordering of this nascent field of inquiry by unacknowledged sources of steering. One key source of de facto governance is analyzed: high-level ‘authoritative assessments’ of CE. The focus is on how these assessments are constructing CE as an object of governance through demarcating and categorizing this emerging field of inquiry, and how this contributes to normalizing and institutionalizing CE research (and CE research communities). Scrutinizing the distinct nature and political implications of de facto governance, particularly of novel and speculative technological trajectories not yet subject to formal steering, remains a key task for governance scholars.

KW - de facto governance

KW - climate engineering

KW - geoengineering

KW - scientific assessments

KW - carbon dioxide removal

KW - solar radiation management

U2 - 10.1080/09644016.2018.1452373

DO - 10.1080/09644016.2018.1452373

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 480

EP - 501

JO - Environmental Politics

T2 - Environmental Politics

JF - Environmental Politics

SN - 0964-4016

IS - 3

ER -