Cueing task goals and earning money: Relatively high monetary rewards reduce failures to act on goals in a Stroop task

Harm Veling*, Henk Aarts

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examined the role of monetary rewards in failures to act on goals in a Stroop task. Based on recent developments in theorizing on the interplay between rewards and cognitive control, we hypothesized that relatively high monetary rewards enhance the focus and stability of a cued task goal compared to low monetary rewards, and hence cause a reduction in failures to act on current task goals under circumstances that warrant top-down goal implementation. To test this, participants received a modified version of the Stroop task, in which they were either briefly cued with the goal of naming the color or meaning of targets on a trial-by-trial basis. After goal cuing, but before presenting the target, either a low or high reward cue was presented. Results showed that higher rewards produced a general speed-up. More importantly, Stroop interference on error rates was lower in the high reward condition compared to the low reward condition, revealing that the rewards enhanced focus and stability of the cued goal. These results provide support for theorizing that reward processing modulates utility assessment of current goals by affecting attention to facilitate goal-directed behavior.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)184-190
Number of pages7
JournalMotivation and Emotion
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cognitive control
  • Goals
  • Reward
  • Stroop interference

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cueing task goals and earning money: Relatively high monetary rewards reduce failures to act on goals in a Stroop task'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this