Cross-agency coordination in the shadow of hierarchy: 'joining up' government geospatial information systems

K. Lance, Y. Georgiadou, A.K. Bregt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Government agencies striving to make geospatial information systems interoperable and cost-effective often appear to function as a self-regulating network shaped only by internal trust and reciprocity. However, recent public management research suggests that external steering of a network, exercised by authoritative bodies through hierarchical means, may invigorate cross-agency coordination. The two case studies of federal geospatial coordination in Canada and the USA confirm this emerging theory of network-hierarchy dynamics. In these countries, the central budget agency (CBA) is influencing resource flows and accountabilities within a federal geospatial network of government agencies, which in turn affects how these agencies deliver 'joined up' services. The CBA relies upon three types of tools: the shaping of network governing structures, promotion of uptake of new management information systems, and the use of evaluation (scrutiny) to solidify accountabilities of the network. Since these tools cast a shadow of hierarchy upon the network, they may be viewed as counter to the voluntary ethos of networks. However, the case studies suggest that the CBA's actions appear to confer legitimacy to the network-resulting in a seeming contradiction-greater central control, more vigorous, distributed geospatial coordination
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)249-269
JournalInternational Journal of Geographical Information Science
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Joining
information system
Information systems
accountability
Management information systems
reciprocity
government agency
Costs
budget
resource
cost
co-ordination
responsibility
public management
MIS
legitimacy
promotion
Canada
costs
evaluation

Keywords

  • public management
  • governance
  • organization

Cite this

@article{c93e942ecce74f6882b046442ab4060f,
title = "Cross-agency coordination in the shadow of hierarchy: 'joining up' government geospatial information systems",
abstract = "Government agencies striving to make geospatial information systems interoperable and cost-effective often appear to function as a self-regulating network shaped only by internal trust and reciprocity. However, recent public management research suggests that external steering of a network, exercised by authoritative bodies through hierarchical means, may invigorate cross-agency coordination. The two case studies of federal geospatial coordination in Canada and the USA confirm this emerging theory of network-hierarchy dynamics. In these countries, the central budget agency (CBA) is influencing resource flows and accountabilities within a federal geospatial network of government agencies, which in turn affects how these agencies deliver 'joined up' services. The CBA relies upon three types of tools: the shaping of network governing structures, promotion of uptake of new management information systems, and the use of evaluation (scrutiny) to solidify accountabilities of the network. Since these tools cast a shadow of hierarchy upon the network, they may be viewed as counter to the voluntary ethos of networks. However, the case studies suggest that the CBA's actions appear to confer legitimacy to the network-resulting in a seeming contradiction-greater central control, more vigorous, distributed geospatial coordination",
keywords = "public management, governance, organization",
author = "K. Lance and Y. Georgiadou and A.K. Bregt",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1080/13658810801909615",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "249--269",
journal = "International Journal of Geographical Information Science",
issn = "1365-8816",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

Cross-agency coordination in the shadow of hierarchy: 'joining up' government geospatial information systems. / Lance, K.; Georgiadou, Y.; Bregt, A.K.

In: International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2009, p. 249-269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-agency coordination in the shadow of hierarchy: 'joining up' government geospatial information systems

AU - Lance, K.

AU - Georgiadou, Y.

AU - Bregt, A.K.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Government agencies striving to make geospatial information systems interoperable and cost-effective often appear to function as a self-regulating network shaped only by internal trust and reciprocity. However, recent public management research suggests that external steering of a network, exercised by authoritative bodies through hierarchical means, may invigorate cross-agency coordination. The two case studies of federal geospatial coordination in Canada and the USA confirm this emerging theory of network-hierarchy dynamics. In these countries, the central budget agency (CBA) is influencing resource flows and accountabilities within a federal geospatial network of government agencies, which in turn affects how these agencies deliver 'joined up' services. The CBA relies upon three types of tools: the shaping of network governing structures, promotion of uptake of new management information systems, and the use of evaluation (scrutiny) to solidify accountabilities of the network. Since these tools cast a shadow of hierarchy upon the network, they may be viewed as counter to the voluntary ethos of networks. However, the case studies suggest that the CBA's actions appear to confer legitimacy to the network-resulting in a seeming contradiction-greater central control, more vigorous, distributed geospatial coordination

AB - Government agencies striving to make geospatial information systems interoperable and cost-effective often appear to function as a self-regulating network shaped only by internal trust and reciprocity. However, recent public management research suggests that external steering of a network, exercised by authoritative bodies through hierarchical means, may invigorate cross-agency coordination. The two case studies of federal geospatial coordination in Canada and the USA confirm this emerging theory of network-hierarchy dynamics. In these countries, the central budget agency (CBA) is influencing resource flows and accountabilities within a federal geospatial network of government agencies, which in turn affects how these agencies deliver 'joined up' services. The CBA relies upon three types of tools: the shaping of network governing structures, promotion of uptake of new management information systems, and the use of evaluation (scrutiny) to solidify accountabilities of the network. Since these tools cast a shadow of hierarchy upon the network, they may be viewed as counter to the voluntary ethos of networks. However, the case studies suggest that the CBA's actions appear to confer legitimacy to the network-resulting in a seeming contradiction-greater central control, more vigorous, distributed geospatial coordination

KW - public management

KW - governance

KW - organization

U2 - 10.1080/13658810801909615

DO - 10.1080/13658810801909615

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 249

EP - 269

JO - International Journal of Geographical Information Science

JF - International Journal of Geographical Information Science

SN - 1365-8816

IS - 2

ER -