TY - JOUR
T1 - Crop stress detection from UAVs
T2 - best practices and lessons learned for exploiting sensor synergies
AU - Chakhvashvili, Erekle
AU - Machwitz, Miriam
AU - Antala, Michal
AU - Rozenstein, Offer
AU - Prikaziuk, Egor
AU - Schlerf, Martin
AU - Naethe, Paul
AU - Wan, Quanxing
AU - Komárek, Jan
AU - Klouek, Tomáš
AU - Wieneke, Sebastian
AU - Siegmann, Bastian
AU - Kefauver, Shawn
AU - Kycko, Marlena
AU - Balde, Hamadou
AU - Paz, Veronica Sobejano
AU - Jimenez-Berni, Jose A.
AU - Buddenbaum, Henning
AU - Hänchen, Lorenz
AU - Wang, Na
AU - Weinman, Amit
AU - Rastogi, Anshu
AU - Malachy, Nitzan
AU - Buchaillot, Maria Luisa
AU - Bendig, Juliane
AU - Rascher, Uwe
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Introduction: Detecting and monitoring crop stress is crucial for ensuring sufficient and sustainable crop production. Recent advancements in unoccupied aerial vehicle (UAV) technology provide a promising approach to map key crop traits indicative of stress. While using single optical sensors mounted on UAVs could be sufficient to monitor crop status in a general sense, implementing multiple sensors that cover various spectral optical domains allow for a more precise characterization of the interactions between crops and biotic or abiotic stressors. Given the novelty of synergistic sensor technology for crop stress detection, standardized procedures outlining their optimal use are currently lacking. Materials and methods: This study explores the key aspects of acquiring high-quality multi-sensor data, including the importance of mission planning, sensor characteristics, and ancillary data. It also details essential data pre-processing steps like atmospheric correction and highlights best practices for data fusion and quality control. Results: Successful multi-sensor data acquisition depends on optimal timing, appropriate sensor calibration, and the use of ancillary data such as ground control points and weather station information. When fusing different sensor data it should be conducted at the level of physical units, with quality flags used to exclude unstable or biased measurements. The paper highlights the importance of using checklists, considering illumination conditions and conducting test flights for the detection of potential pitfalls. Conclusion: Multi-sensor campaigns require careful planning not to jeopardise the success of the campaigns. This paper provides practical information on how to combine different UAV-mounted optical sensors and discuss the proven scientific practices for image data acquisition and post-processing in the context of crop stress monitoring.
AB - Introduction: Detecting and monitoring crop stress is crucial for ensuring sufficient and sustainable crop production. Recent advancements in unoccupied aerial vehicle (UAV) technology provide a promising approach to map key crop traits indicative of stress. While using single optical sensors mounted on UAVs could be sufficient to monitor crop status in a general sense, implementing multiple sensors that cover various spectral optical domains allow for a more precise characterization of the interactions between crops and biotic or abiotic stressors. Given the novelty of synergistic sensor technology for crop stress detection, standardized procedures outlining their optimal use are currently lacking. Materials and methods: This study explores the key aspects of acquiring high-quality multi-sensor data, including the importance of mission planning, sensor characteristics, and ancillary data. It also details essential data pre-processing steps like atmospheric correction and highlights best practices for data fusion and quality control. Results: Successful multi-sensor data acquisition depends on optimal timing, appropriate sensor calibration, and the use of ancillary data such as ground control points and weather station information. When fusing different sensor data it should be conducted at the level of physical units, with quality flags used to exclude unstable or biased measurements. The paper highlights the importance of using checklists, considering illumination conditions and conducting test flights for the detection of potential pitfalls. Conclusion: Multi-sensor campaigns require careful planning not to jeopardise the success of the campaigns. This paper provides practical information on how to combine different UAV-mounted optical sensors and discuss the proven scientific practices for image data acquisition and post-processing in the context of crop stress monitoring.
KW - Crop stress
KW - Optical sensors
KW - Sensor synergy
KW - UAVs
U2 - 10.1007/s11119-024-10168-3
DO - 10.1007/s11119-024-10168-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85200988644
SN - 1385-2256
VL - 25
SP - 2614
EP - 2642
JO - Precision Agriculture
JF - Precision Agriculture
IS - 5
ER -