Crop insurance and pesticide use in European agriculture

Niklas Möhring, Tobias Dalhaus, Geoffroy Enjolras, Robert Finger*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)


The provision of better risk management tools for farmers and the reduction of adverse effects from pesticide use are both important goals of agricultural policy – but are potentially interrelated and might contradict each other. In this article, we analyze the relation of crop insurance and pesticide use in European agriculture using the examples of France and Switzerland. In our conceptual and empirical framework, we account for the complex structure of insurance uptake, land use and pesticide use decisions of farmers, potentially leading to insurance - pesticide use interactions both at the intensive and extensive margin. Our empirical results indicate a positive and economically significant relation between crop insurance and pesticide use in European agriculture. The findings suggest that without crop insurance, pesticide expenditures would be 6 to 11% lower. However, the importance of extensive and intensive margin relations differs between France and Switzerland and is related to country specific characteristics. We conclude that new risk management instruments should account for potential effects on input use.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102902
Number of pages18
JournalAgricultural Systems
Early online date23 Jul 2020
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2020


  • Crop insurance
  • Europe
  • France
  • Pesticide use
  • Risk management
  • Switzerland

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Crop insurance and pesticide use in European agriculture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this