COVID Policy and Urban Food Markets in Peru: Governance and Compliance

G. Ton*, M. Espinoza Hermoza, R. Fort

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Urban food markets are essential channels of food distribution and spaces of social interaction where COVID-19 could be easily transmitted. The Peruvian government used budget incentives to motivate local governments to implement social distancing and food safety measures in these markets. Two surveys, in May and November 2020, show that municipality-owned markets had better compliance than privately or vendor-owned markets, especially with vendor protection measures and common space adaptations. Qualitative interviews helped to identify plausible causal mechanisms that explain this finding. Local governments perceived legal restrictions to investing public funds in privately owned markets, while vendor-owned markets faced agency dilemmas and opportunistic behaviour in decision-making about the required collective investments. We argue that a small-grants or loan facility specifically targeted at vendor-owned markets could have reduced these governance challenges and improved compliance. Peru’s budget incentive policy to support food market governance could inspire other countries to design appropriate policy instruments for food safety and public health.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)854-872
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Development Studies
Volume59
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Feb 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Market places
  • collective action
  • food safety governance
  • food environment
  • COVID-19
  • co-regulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'COVID Policy and Urban Food Markets in Peru: Governance and Compliance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this