Costs and efficacy of management measures to improve udder health on Dutch dairy farms

K. Huijps, H. Hogeveen, T.J.G.M. Lam, A.G.J.M. Oude Lansink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many different management measures are available to control mastitis, a very costly disease in the dairy sector. The objective of this paper was to evaluate the costs and efficacies of 18 of these management measures, for contagious and environmental pathogens, and their effect on bulk tank somatic cell count (BTSCC) and incidence of clinical mastitis (CM). To determine the efficacies for these management measures, literature data and expertise were combined using Monte Carlo expert evaluation analysis. The effect of management measures varied with the incidence of CM and BTSCC, as well as for environmental and contagious problems. On average, postmilking teat disinfection was found to be the most effective measure in all situations. All management measures had large uncertainty around the most likely value. Results of a data envelopment analysis showed that 4 of the management measures included formed the best-practice frontier (the most cost-efficient measures): keeping cows standing after milking, rinsing clusters after milking a clinical case, using a separate cloth for all cows, and wearing milkers’ gloves. Of the top 25 management measures (the 18 base management measures including levels of compliance), 8 were measures with 100% compliance; the others were sublevels of these measures with compliance varying between 25 and 100%. A lower hourly rate of the farmer did not influence management measures from the best-practice frontier, but had some effect on the efficiency scores of the other management measures
LanguageEnglish
Pages115-124
JournalJournal of Dairy Science
Volume93
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Animal Mammary Glands
Mastitis
udders
dairy farming
Practice Guidelines
Costs and Cost Analysis
Compliance
Health
Cell Count
Disinfection
Incidence
Uncertainty
compliance
mastitis
milk tanks
somatic cell count
milking
Farms
cows
incidence

Keywords

  • clinical mastitis
  • risk-factors
  • herds

Cite this

@article{39e144a3e6a5422882e7818a006a2ca7,
title = "Costs and efficacy of management measures to improve udder health on Dutch dairy farms",
abstract = "Many different management measures are available to control mastitis, a very costly disease in the dairy sector. The objective of this paper was to evaluate the costs and efficacies of 18 of these management measures, for contagious and environmental pathogens, and their effect on bulk tank somatic cell count (BTSCC) and incidence of clinical mastitis (CM). To determine the efficacies for these management measures, literature data and expertise were combined using Monte Carlo expert evaluation analysis. The effect of management measures varied with the incidence of CM and BTSCC, as well as for environmental and contagious problems. On average, postmilking teat disinfection was found to be the most effective measure in all situations. All management measures had large uncertainty around the most likely value. Results of a data envelopment analysis showed that 4 of the management measures included formed the best-practice frontier (the most cost-efficient measures): keeping cows standing after milking, rinsing clusters after milking a clinical case, using a separate cloth for all cows, and wearing milkers’ gloves. Of the top 25 management measures (the 18 base management measures including levels of compliance), 8 were measures with 100{\%} compliance; the others were sublevels of these measures with compliance varying between 25 and 100{\%}. A lower hourly rate of the farmer did not influence management measures from the best-practice frontier, but had some effect on the efficiency scores of the other management measures",
keywords = "clinical mastitis, risk-factors, herds",
author = "K. Huijps and H. Hogeveen and T.J.G.M. Lam and {Oude Lansink}, A.G.J.M.",
note = "PORmapnr. 1926",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.3168/jds.2009-2412",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
pages = "115--124",
journal = "Journal of Dairy Science",
issn = "0022-0302",
publisher = "American Dairy Science Association",
number = "1",

}

Costs and efficacy of management measures to improve udder health on Dutch dairy farms. / Huijps, K.; Hogeveen, H.; Lam, T.J.G.M.; Oude Lansink, A.G.J.M.

In: Journal of Dairy Science, Vol. 93, No. 1, 2010, p. 115-124.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Costs and efficacy of management measures to improve udder health on Dutch dairy farms

AU - Huijps, K.

AU - Hogeveen, H.

AU - Lam, T.J.G.M.

AU - Oude Lansink, A.G.J.M.

N1 - PORmapnr. 1926

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Many different management measures are available to control mastitis, a very costly disease in the dairy sector. The objective of this paper was to evaluate the costs and efficacies of 18 of these management measures, for contagious and environmental pathogens, and their effect on bulk tank somatic cell count (BTSCC) and incidence of clinical mastitis (CM). To determine the efficacies for these management measures, literature data and expertise were combined using Monte Carlo expert evaluation analysis. The effect of management measures varied with the incidence of CM and BTSCC, as well as for environmental and contagious problems. On average, postmilking teat disinfection was found to be the most effective measure in all situations. All management measures had large uncertainty around the most likely value. Results of a data envelopment analysis showed that 4 of the management measures included formed the best-practice frontier (the most cost-efficient measures): keeping cows standing after milking, rinsing clusters after milking a clinical case, using a separate cloth for all cows, and wearing milkers’ gloves. Of the top 25 management measures (the 18 base management measures including levels of compliance), 8 were measures with 100% compliance; the others were sublevels of these measures with compliance varying between 25 and 100%. A lower hourly rate of the farmer did not influence management measures from the best-practice frontier, but had some effect on the efficiency scores of the other management measures

AB - Many different management measures are available to control mastitis, a very costly disease in the dairy sector. The objective of this paper was to evaluate the costs and efficacies of 18 of these management measures, for contagious and environmental pathogens, and their effect on bulk tank somatic cell count (BTSCC) and incidence of clinical mastitis (CM). To determine the efficacies for these management measures, literature data and expertise were combined using Monte Carlo expert evaluation analysis. The effect of management measures varied with the incidence of CM and BTSCC, as well as for environmental and contagious problems. On average, postmilking teat disinfection was found to be the most effective measure in all situations. All management measures had large uncertainty around the most likely value. Results of a data envelopment analysis showed that 4 of the management measures included formed the best-practice frontier (the most cost-efficient measures): keeping cows standing after milking, rinsing clusters after milking a clinical case, using a separate cloth for all cows, and wearing milkers’ gloves. Of the top 25 management measures (the 18 base management measures including levels of compliance), 8 were measures with 100% compliance; the others were sublevels of these measures with compliance varying between 25 and 100%. A lower hourly rate of the farmer did not influence management measures from the best-practice frontier, but had some effect on the efficiency scores of the other management measures

KW - clinical mastitis

KW - risk-factors

KW - herds

U2 - 10.3168/jds.2009-2412

DO - 10.3168/jds.2009-2412

M3 - Article

VL - 93

SP - 115

EP - 124

JO - Journal of Dairy Science

T2 - Journal of Dairy Science

JF - Journal of Dairy Science

SN - 0022-0302

IS - 1

ER -