Costs and benefits to European shipping of ballast-water and hull-fouling treatment: Impacts of native and non-indigenous species

Jose A. Fernandes, Lionel Santos, Thomas Vance, Tim Fileman, David Smith, John D.D. Bishop, Frédérique Viard, Ana M. Queirós, Gorka Merino, Erik Buisman, Melanie C. Austen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Maritime transport and shipping are impacted negatively by biofouling, which can result in increased fuel consumption. Thus, costs for fouling reduction can be considered an investment to reduce fuel consumption. Anti-fouling measures also reduce the rate of introduction of non-indigenous species (NIS). Further mitigation measures to reduce the transport of NIS within ballast water and sediments impose additional costs. The estimated operational cost of NIS mitigation measures may represent between 1.6% and 4% of the annual operational cost for a ship operating on European seas, with the higher proportional costs in small ships. However, fouling by NIS may affect fuel consumption more than fouling by native species due to differences in species' life-history traits and their resistance to antifouling coatings and pollution. Therefore, it is possible that the cost of NIS mitigation measures could be smaller than the cost from higher fuel consumption arising from fouling by NIS.

LanguageEnglish
Pages148-155
JournalMarine Policy
Volume64
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2016

Fingerprint

ballast water
shipping
fouling
hull
hulls
indigenous species
energy use and consumption
water
fuel consumption
pollution control
costs
cost
ships
antifouling
biofouling
interspecific variation
coatings
Shipping
Costs and benefits
Water

Keywords

  • Ballast water
  • Biofouling
  • Economic impact
  • Maritime
  • Mitigation measures
  • Native
  • Non-indigenous species
  • Shipping

Cite this

Fernandes, J. A., Santos, L., Vance, T., Fileman, T., Smith, D., Bishop, J. D. D., ... Austen, M. C. (2016). Costs and benefits to European shipping of ballast-water and hull-fouling treatment: Impacts of native and non-indigenous species. Marine Policy, 64, 148-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.11.015
Fernandes, Jose A. ; Santos, Lionel ; Vance, Thomas ; Fileman, Tim ; Smith, David ; Bishop, John D.D. ; Viard, Frédérique ; Queirós, Ana M. ; Merino, Gorka ; Buisman, Erik ; Austen, Melanie C. / Costs and benefits to European shipping of ballast-water and hull-fouling treatment : Impacts of native and non-indigenous species. In: Marine Policy. 2016 ; Vol. 64. pp. 148-155.
@article{889106e3e8ac4f14aaf8176eba7ec43c,
title = "Costs and benefits to European shipping of ballast-water and hull-fouling treatment: Impacts of native and non-indigenous species",
abstract = "Maritime transport and shipping are impacted negatively by biofouling, which can result in increased fuel consumption. Thus, costs for fouling reduction can be considered an investment to reduce fuel consumption. Anti-fouling measures also reduce the rate of introduction of non-indigenous species (NIS). Further mitigation measures to reduce the transport of NIS within ballast water and sediments impose additional costs. The estimated operational cost of NIS mitigation measures may represent between 1.6{\%} and 4{\%} of the annual operational cost for a ship operating on European seas, with the higher proportional costs in small ships. However, fouling by NIS may affect fuel consumption more than fouling by native species due to differences in species' life-history traits and their resistance to antifouling coatings and pollution. Therefore, it is possible that the cost of NIS mitigation measures could be smaller than the cost from higher fuel consumption arising from fouling by NIS.",
keywords = "Ballast water, Biofouling, Economic impact, Maritime, Mitigation measures, Native, Non-indigenous species, Shipping",
author = "Fernandes, {Jose A.} and Lionel Santos and Thomas Vance and Tim Fileman and David Smith and Bishop, {John D.D.} and Fr{\'e}d{\'e}rique Viard and Queir{\'o}s, {Ana M.} and Gorka Merino and Erik Buisman and Austen, {Melanie C.}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.marpol.2015.11.015",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "148--155",
journal = "Marine Policy",
issn = "0308-597X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Fernandes, JA, Santos, L, Vance, T, Fileman, T, Smith, D, Bishop, JDD, Viard, F, Queirós, AM, Merino, G, Buisman, E & Austen, MC 2016, 'Costs and benefits to European shipping of ballast-water and hull-fouling treatment: Impacts of native and non-indigenous species', Marine Policy, vol. 64, pp. 148-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.11.015

Costs and benefits to European shipping of ballast-water and hull-fouling treatment : Impacts of native and non-indigenous species. / Fernandes, Jose A.; Santos, Lionel; Vance, Thomas; Fileman, Tim; Smith, David; Bishop, John D.D.; Viard, Frédérique; Queirós, Ana M.; Merino, Gorka; Buisman, Erik; Austen, Melanie C.

In: Marine Policy, Vol. 64, 01.02.2016, p. 148-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Costs and benefits to European shipping of ballast-water and hull-fouling treatment

T2 - Marine Policy

AU - Fernandes, Jose A.

AU - Santos, Lionel

AU - Vance, Thomas

AU - Fileman, Tim

AU - Smith, David

AU - Bishop, John D.D.

AU - Viard, Frédérique

AU - Queirós, Ana M.

AU - Merino, Gorka

AU - Buisman, Erik

AU - Austen, Melanie C.

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Maritime transport and shipping are impacted negatively by biofouling, which can result in increased fuel consumption. Thus, costs for fouling reduction can be considered an investment to reduce fuel consumption. Anti-fouling measures also reduce the rate of introduction of non-indigenous species (NIS). Further mitigation measures to reduce the transport of NIS within ballast water and sediments impose additional costs. The estimated operational cost of NIS mitigation measures may represent between 1.6% and 4% of the annual operational cost for a ship operating on European seas, with the higher proportional costs in small ships. However, fouling by NIS may affect fuel consumption more than fouling by native species due to differences in species' life-history traits and their resistance to antifouling coatings and pollution. Therefore, it is possible that the cost of NIS mitigation measures could be smaller than the cost from higher fuel consumption arising from fouling by NIS.

AB - Maritime transport and shipping are impacted negatively by biofouling, which can result in increased fuel consumption. Thus, costs for fouling reduction can be considered an investment to reduce fuel consumption. Anti-fouling measures also reduce the rate of introduction of non-indigenous species (NIS). Further mitigation measures to reduce the transport of NIS within ballast water and sediments impose additional costs. The estimated operational cost of NIS mitigation measures may represent between 1.6% and 4% of the annual operational cost for a ship operating on European seas, with the higher proportional costs in small ships. However, fouling by NIS may affect fuel consumption more than fouling by native species due to differences in species' life-history traits and their resistance to antifouling coatings and pollution. Therefore, it is possible that the cost of NIS mitigation measures could be smaller than the cost from higher fuel consumption arising from fouling by NIS.

KW - Ballast water

KW - Biofouling

KW - Economic impact

KW - Maritime

KW - Mitigation measures

KW - Native

KW - Non-indigenous species

KW - Shipping

U2 - 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.11.015

DO - 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.11.015

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 148

EP - 155

JO - Marine Policy

JF - Marine Policy

SN - 0308-597X

ER -