Cost-effectiveness analysis of water-saving irrigation technologies based on climate change response: A case study of China

Xiaoxia Zou, Y. Li*, Roger Cremades, Qingzhu Gao, Yunfan Wan, Xiaobo Qin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study provides a cost-effectiveness analysis of four water-saving irrigation techniques that are widely implemented in China to address the impacts of climate change: sprinkler irrigation, micro-irrigation, low-pressure pipe irrigation and channel lining. The aim is to thoroughly understand the economic feasibility of water-saving irrigation as an approach to coping with climate change. Based on the cost-effectiveness analysis, this study finds that water-saving irrigation is cost-effective in coping with climate change, and has benefits for climate change mitigation and adaptation, and for sustainable economic development. For the cost-effectiveness ratio of mitigation and adaptation, only that of channel lining is negative (for mitigation is -43.02 to -73.41US$/t, for grain yield increase -34.35 to -20.13US$/t, and for water saving -0.020 to -0.012US$/m3). Sprinkler irrigation has the highest incremental cost for mitigation (476.03-691.64US$/t), because when sprinkler irrigation is used, there may be additional energy needs to meet water pressure requirements, which may increase greenhouse gas emissions compared to traditional irrigation. For mitigation, in districts where the pumping head for pressure is lower than the critical energy saving head, sprinkler irrigation should be avoided. Micro-irrigation has the highest incremental cost for adaptation followed by sprinkler irrigation and low-pressure pipe irrigation, but when considering the revenues from improved adaptation, all of the measures assessed are economically feasible. The results suggest that for mitigation and adaptation objectives, micro-irrigation performs best. From an economic perspective, channel lining is recommended. Therefore, a balanced development of channel lining and micro-irrigation according to different geographical conditions is recommended.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-20
Number of pages12
JournalAgricultural Water Management
Volume129
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Adaptation and mitigation
  • Climate change
  • Cost-effectiveness analysis
  • Water-saving irrigation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-effectiveness analysis of water-saving irrigation technologies based on climate change response: A case study of China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this