Coprophagy in dogs interferes in the diagnosis of parasitic infections by faecal examination

R. Nijsse, L. Mughini-Gras, J.A. Wagenaar, H.W. Ploeger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many dogs display coprophagic behaviour. Helminth eggs can passively pass the dog's digestive tract and this may result in a false positive diagnosis of infection with gastrointestinal helminth parasites. For a period of one year, faecal samples of dogs were examined monthly using the Centrifugal Sedimentation Flotation (CSF) technique with a sugar flotation solution (s.g. 1.27-1.30 g/cm(3)). If a sample tested positive for canine helminth eggs, the owner was asked to submit another sample after preventing the dog from eating faeces for 3 days. If the second sample again tested positive for the same type of helminth egg, the dog was considered to have a patent infection. If the second sample tested negative, the first sample was considered a false positive due to coprophagy. The focus of this study was on dogs shedding Toxocara eggs. At the first examination, 246 samples (out of 308 samples testing positive for canine-specific helminth eggs) tested positive for Toxocara spp. Of these, 120 (49%) tested negative at the second examination. Coprophagic behaviour was recognized by 261 of the 564 owners that answered the accompanying questionnaire. This concerned 391 dogs. Coproscopical examination also provided proof of coprophagy (e.g. oocysts of Eimeria spp. or non-dog typical helminth eggs) in dogs belonging to owners that did not report coprophagic behaviour in their dogs. Results indicate that coprophagy in dogs may result in an overestimation of the prevalence of patent helminth infections and that dogs may serve as a transport host for helminth eggs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)304-309
Number of pages6
JournalVeterinary Parasitology
Volume204
Issue number3-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Aug 2014

Fingerprint

Coprophagia
coprophagy
Parasitic Diseases
parasitoses
Helminths
Dogs
dogs
helminths
Eggs
Toxocara
sampling
patents
Canidae
Infection
Eimeria
Oocysts
helminthiasis
Feces

Keywords

  • Coprophagy
  • Coproscopical examination
  • Dogs
  • Nematodes
  • Roundworms
  • Toxocara

Cite this

Nijsse, R. ; Mughini-Gras, L. ; Wagenaar, J.A. ; Ploeger, H.W. / Coprophagy in dogs interferes in the diagnosis of parasitic infections by faecal examination. In: Veterinary Parasitology. 2014 ; Vol. 204, No. 3-4. pp. 304-309.
@article{e369495910f842768f4897d2ec30ad6f,
title = "Coprophagy in dogs interferes in the diagnosis of parasitic infections by faecal examination",
abstract = "Many dogs display coprophagic behaviour. Helminth eggs can passively pass the dog's digestive tract and this may result in a false positive diagnosis of infection with gastrointestinal helminth parasites. For a period of one year, faecal samples of dogs were examined monthly using the Centrifugal Sedimentation Flotation (CSF) technique with a sugar flotation solution (s.g. 1.27-1.30 g/cm(3)). If a sample tested positive for canine helminth eggs, the owner was asked to submit another sample after preventing the dog from eating faeces for 3 days. If the second sample again tested positive for the same type of helminth egg, the dog was considered to have a patent infection. If the second sample tested negative, the first sample was considered a false positive due to coprophagy. The focus of this study was on dogs shedding Toxocara eggs. At the first examination, 246 samples (out of 308 samples testing positive for canine-specific helminth eggs) tested positive for Toxocara spp. Of these, 120 (49{\%}) tested negative at the second examination. Coprophagic behaviour was recognized by 261 of the 564 owners that answered the accompanying questionnaire. This concerned 391 dogs. Coproscopical examination also provided proof of coprophagy (e.g. oocysts of Eimeria spp. or non-dog typical helminth eggs) in dogs belonging to owners that did not report coprophagic behaviour in their dogs. Results indicate that coprophagy in dogs may result in an overestimation of the prevalence of patent helminth infections and that dogs may serve as a transport host for helminth eggs.",
keywords = "Coprophagy, Coproscopical examination, Dogs, Nematodes, Roundworms, Toxocara",
author = "R. Nijsse and L. Mughini-Gras and J.A. Wagenaar and H.W. Ploeger",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.05.019",
language = "English",
volume = "204",
pages = "304--309",
journal = "Veterinary Parasitology",
issn = "0304-4017",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3-4",

}

Coprophagy in dogs interferes in the diagnosis of parasitic infections by faecal examination. / Nijsse, R.; Mughini-Gras, L.; Wagenaar, J.A.; Ploeger, H.W.

In: Veterinary Parasitology, Vol. 204, No. 3-4, 29.08.2014, p. 304-309.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coprophagy in dogs interferes in the diagnosis of parasitic infections by faecal examination

AU - Nijsse, R.

AU - Mughini-Gras, L.

AU - Wagenaar, J.A.

AU - Ploeger, H.W.

PY - 2014/8/29

Y1 - 2014/8/29

N2 - Many dogs display coprophagic behaviour. Helminth eggs can passively pass the dog's digestive tract and this may result in a false positive diagnosis of infection with gastrointestinal helminth parasites. For a period of one year, faecal samples of dogs were examined monthly using the Centrifugal Sedimentation Flotation (CSF) technique with a sugar flotation solution (s.g. 1.27-1.30 g/cm(3)). If a sample tested positive for canine helminth eggs, the owner was asked to submit another sample after preventing the dog from eating faeces for 3 days. If the second sample again tested positive for the same type of helminth egg, the dog was considered to have a patent infection. If the second sample tested negative, the first sample was considered a false positive due to coprophagy. The focus of this study was on dogs shedding Toxocara eggs. At the first examination, 246 samples (out of 308 samples testing positive for canine-specific helminth eggs) tested positive for Toxocara spp. Of these, 120 (49%) tested negative at the second examination. Coprophagic behaviour was recognized by 261 of the 564 owners that answered the accompanying questionnaire. This concerned 391 dogs. Coproscopical examination also provided proof of coprophagy (e.g. oocysts of Eimeria spp. or non-dog typical helminth eggs) in dogs belonging to owners that did not report coprophagic behaviour in their dogs. Results indicate that coprophagy in dogs may result in an overestimation of the prevalence of patent helminth infections and that dogs may serve as a transport host for helminth eggs.

AB - Many dogs display coprophagic behaviour. Helminth eggs can passively pass the dog's digestive tract and this may result in a false positive diagnosis of infection with gastrointestinal helminth parasites. For a period of one year, faecal samples of dogs were examined monthly using the Centrifugal Sedimentation Flotation (CSF) technique with a sugar flotation solution (s.g. 1.27-1.30 g/cm(3)). If a sample tested positive for canine helminth eggs, the owner was asked to submit another sample after preventing the dog from eating faeces for 3 days. If the second sample again tested positive for the same type of helminth egg, the dog was considered to have a patent infection. If the second sample tested negative, the first sample was considered a false positive due to coprophagy. The focus of this study was on dogs shedding Toxocara eggs. At the first examination, 246 samples (out of 308 samples testing positive for canine-specific helminth eggs) tested positive for Toxocara spp. Of these, 120 (49%) tested negative at the second examination. Coprophagic behaviour was recognized by 261 of the 564 owners that answered the accompanying questionnaire. This concerned 391 dogs. Coproscopical examination also provided proof of coprophagy (e.g. oocysts of Eimeria spp. or non-dog typical helminth eggs) in dogs belonging to owners that did not report coprophagic behaviour in their dogs. Results indicate that coprophagy in dogs may result in an overestimation of the prevalence of patent helminth infections and that dogs may serve as a transport host for helminth eggs.

KW - Coprophagy

KW - Coproscopical examination

KW - Dogs

KW - Nematodes

KW - Roundworms

KW - Toxocara

U2 - 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.05.019

DO - 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.05.019

M3 - Article

VL - 204

SP - 304

EP - 309

JO - Veterinary Parasitology

JF - Veterinary Parasitology

SN - 0304-4017

IS - 3-4

ER -