Contributions of experimental approaches to development and poverty alleviation

Field experiments and humanitarian assistance

John Quattrochi, Jenny C. Aker, Peter van der Windt, Maarten Voors*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademic

Abstract

The work of Nobel Laureates Banerjee, Duflo and Kremer has centered around the use of randomized control trials to help solve development problems. To date, however, few field experiments have been undertaken to evaluate the effects of humanitarian assistance. The reasons may lie in challenges related to logistics, fragility, security and ethics that often loom large in humanitarian settings. Yet every year, billions of dollars are spent on humanitarian aid, and policymakers are in need of rigorous evidence. In this paper, we reflect on the opportunities and risks of running experiments in humanitarian settings, and provide, as illustration, insights from our experiences with recent field experiments of large-scale humanitarian aid programs in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Original languageEnglish
Article number104830
JournalWorld Development
Volume127
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2020

Fingerprint

humanitarian aid
poverty alleviation
assistance
poverty
experiment
ethics
logistics
Democratic Republic of the Congo
dollar
moral philosophy
evidence
field experiment
Poverty alleviation
Humanitarian aid
Field experiment
experience

Cite this

@article{d85d85bdb54f480d8828983ee728a2a2,
title = "Contributions of experimental approaches to development and poverty alleviation: Field experiments and humanitarian assistance",
abstract = "The work of Nobel Laureates Banerjee, Duflo and Kremer has centered around the use of randomized control trials to help solve development problems. To date, however, few field experiments have been undertaken to evaluate the effects of humanitarian assistance. The reasons may lie in challenges related to logistics, fragility, security and ethics that often loom large in humanitarian settings. Yet every year, billions of dollars are spent on humanitarian aid, and policymakers are in need of rigorous evidence. In this paper, we reflect on the opportunities and risks of running experiments in humanitarian settings, and provide, as illustration, insights from our experiences with recent field experiments of large-scale humanitarian aid programs in the Democratic Republic of Congo.",
author = "John Quattrochi and Aker, {Jenny C.} and {van der Windt}, Peter and Maarten Voors",
year = "2020",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104830",
language = "English",
volume = "127",
journal = "World Development",
issn = "0305-750X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Contributions of experimental approaches to development and poverty alleviation : Field experiments and humanitarian assistance. / Quattrochi, John; Aker, Jenny C.; van der Windt, Peter; Voors, Maarten.

In: World Development, Vol. 127, 104830, 01.03.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademic

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contributions of experimental approaches to development and poverty alleviation

T2 - Field experiments and humanitarian assistance

AU - Quattrochi, John

AU - Aker, Jenny C.

AU - van der Windt, Peter

AU - Voors, Maarten

PY - 2020/3/1

Y1 - 2020/3/1

N2 - The work of Nobel Laureates Banerjee, Duflo and Kremer has centered around the use of randomized control trials to help solve development problems. To date, however, few field experiments have been undertaken to evaluate the effects of humanitarian assistance. The reasons may lie in challenges related to logistics, fragility, security and ethics that often loom large in humanitarian settings. Yet every year, billions of dollars are spent on humanitarian aid, and policymakers are in need of rigorous evidence. In this paper, we reflect on the opportunities and risks of running experiments in humanitarian settings, and provide, as illustration, insights from our experiences with recent field experiments of large-scale humanitarian aid programs in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

AB - The work of Nobel Laureates Banerjee, Duflo and Kremer has centered around the use of randomized control trials to help solve development problems. To date, however, few field experiments have been undertaken to evaluate the effects of humanitarian assistance. The reasons may lie in challenges related to logistics, fragility, security and ethics that often loom large in humanitarian settings. Yet every year, billions of dollars are spent on humanitarian aid, and policymakers are in need of rigorous evidence. In this paper, we reflect on the opportunities and risks of running experiments in humanitarian settings, and provide, as illustration, insights from our experiences with recent field experiments of large-scale humanitarian aid programs in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

U2 - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104830

DO - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104830

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

VL - 127

JO - World Development

JF - World Development

SN - 0305-750X

M1 - 104830

ER -