Abstract
For measuring absolute values of spray drift from orchard spraying it is discussed what the minimal width of the treated area should be to collect the downwind airborne drift. In field measurements it is quantified what the contribution of individual path sprayings is to the airborne drift in both a dormant as a full leaf situation of an apple orchard. Second path spraying contributed most to outside field airborne drift. This could be reduced by 22-26% by single-sided spraying of the second path. With increasing distance from the field edge airborne drift was found at greater heights. In the dormant situation airborne drift was two times higher as in the full leaf stage. Number of paths needed to recover more than 95% of collected airborne drift was 10. This relates to a width of the treated area of 30m, which is wider than the suggested width of 20m in some drift measurement protocols.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | 8th Workshop on Spray Application Techniques in Fruit Growing June 2005 Barcelona |
| Subtitle of host publication | Book of Abstracts |
| Editors | E. Gil, F. Solanelles |
| Place of Publication | Barcelona |
| Publisher | Universitat de Lleida |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 |
| Event | 8th Workshop on Spray Application Techniques In Fruit Growing - Duration: 29 Jun 2005 → 1 Jul 2005 |
Workshop
| Workshop | 8th Workshop on Spray Application Techniques In Fruit Growing |
|---|---|
| Period | 29/06/05 → 1/07/05 |
Keywords
- airborne drift
- orchard spraying
- cross-flow fan sprayer
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Contribution of individual tree row sprayings to airborne spray drift spraying an apple orchard'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver