Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Consumers' view on pork: Consumption motives and production preferences in ten European Union and four non-European Union countries

  • Li Lin-Schilstra*
  • , Gé Backus
  • , Harriette Snoek
  • , Daniel Mörlein
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    To analyse consumers' attitudes and perceptions towards pork, online surveys were performed with 11,294 consumers from ten European Union (EU) and four non-EU countries. The survey indicates that, although animal welfare affects consumers' view on pork, it is not consumers' primary concern. For most countries, the ranking order of food motives was health and natural, sensory quality, price, and animal welfare. The ranking order for pork production preferences was quality and health, environmental and animal friendliness, regional identity, and production efficiency. A choice experiment, conducted for four countries: Denmark, France, Italy, and Poland, showed that natural was the most important factor, followed by health, taste, animals' pain and stress, costs, and pharmaceutical interventions. Four consumer segments were identified: Demanding, Average, Low-on-eco, and Indifferent. Although the percentage shares of these groups differ in each country, we conclude that consumer consumption motives and production preferences are sufficiently similar to include them as communicative elements in marketing strategies for meat from non-castrated pigs.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number108736
    JournalMeat Science
    Volume187
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2022

    Keywords

    • Boars
    • Choice experiment
    • Consumption motives
    • Immunovaccination
    • Pig castration
    • Production preferences

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Consumers' view on pork: Consumption motives and production preferences in ten European Union and four non-European Union countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this