Consumer confidence in the safety of food in Canada and the Netherlands: The validation of a generic framework

J. de Jonge, J.C.M. van Trijp, E. Goddard, L.J. Frewer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A thorough understanding of consumer confidence in the safety of food and the factors by which this is influenced is necessary for the development of adequate and effective risk management and communication regarding food safety issues. As food chains become globalized, risk management and communication are increasingly applied at international levels. As a consequence, cross-culturally valid theoretical models are needed to investigate consumer confidence in the safety of food. In this study, consumer confidence in the safety of food in Canada and the Netherlands was systematically compared. On the basis of two nationally representative samples, it was examined to what extent differences in consumer confidence between the two countries resulted from differences in the relative importance of the determinants of confidence, and differences in the means of the constructs. No differences between Canada and the Netherlands were found regarding the relative importance of the determinants, which provides support for the generalizability of the framework. However, results indicated that Dutch consumers had a higher level of optimism and a lower level of pessimism regarding the safety of food, which appeared to be mainly related to Dutch consumers¿ lower level of concern about factors related to production. The results also indicated cross-national differences in consumer recall of food safety issues in the media. Keywords: Food safety; Confidence; Trust; Risk management; Risk communication; Risk perception
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)439-451
JournalFood Quality and Preference
Volume19
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Food Safety
Netherlands
Canada
food safety
risk communication
risk management
Risk Management
Communication
risk perception
Food Chain
food chain
Theoretical Models

Keywords

  • mad-cow-disease
  • confirmatory factor-analysis
  • state worry questionnaire
  • social amplification
  • risk-management
  • trust
  • constructs
  • distrust
  • hazards
  • choice

Cite this

@article{7dec4e4193524302a16be40dfd1c9a9e,
title = "Consumer confidence in the safety of food in Canada and the Netherlands: The validation of a generic framework",
abstract = "A thorough understanding of consumer confidence in the safety of food and the factors by which this is influenced is necessary for the development of adequate and effective risk management and communication regarding food safety issues. As food chains become globalized, risk management and communication are increasingly applied at international levels. As a consequence, cross-culturally valid theoretical models are needed to investigate consumer confidence in the safety of food. In this study, consumer confidence in the safety of food in Canada and the Netherlands was systematically compared. On the basis of two nationally representative samples, it was examined to what extent differences in consumer confidence between the two countries resulted from differences in the relative importance of the determinants of confidence, and differences in the means of the constructs. No differences between Canada and the Netherlands were found regarding the relative importance of the determinants, which provides support for the generalizability of the framework. However, results indicated that Dutch consumers had a higher level of optimism and a lower level of pessimism regarding the safety of food, which appeared to be mainly related to Dutch consumers¿ lower level of concern about factors related to production. The results also indicated cross-national differences in consumer recall of food safety issues in the media. Keywords: Food safety; Confidence; Trust; Risk management; Risk communication; Risk perception",
keywords = "mad-cow-disease, confirmatory factor-analysis, state worry questionnaire, social amplification, risk-management, trust, constructs, distrust, hazards, choice",
author = "{de Jonge}, J. and {van Trijp}, J.C.M. and E. Goddard and L.J. Frewer",
note = "nog reeksnummer uitzoeken",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.01.002",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "439--451",
journal = "Food Quality and Preference",
issn = "0950-3293",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

Consumer confidence in the safety of food in Canada and the Netherlands: The validation of a generic framework. / de Jonge, J.; van Trijp, J.C.M.; Goddard, E.; Frewer, L.J.

In: Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 19, No. 5, 2008, p. 439-451.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consumer confidence in the safety of food in Canada and the Netherlands: The validation of a generic framework

AU - de Jonge, J.

AU - van Trijp, J.C.M.

AU - Goddard, E.

AU - Frewer, L.J.

N1 - nog reeksnummer uitzoeken

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - A thorough understanding of consumer confidence in the safety of food and the factors by which this is influenced is necessary for the development of adequate and effective risk management and communication regarding food safety issues. As food chains become globalized, risk management and communication are increasingly applied at international levels. As a consequence, cross-culturally valid theoretical models are needed to investigate consumer confidence in the safety of food. In this study, consumer confidence in the safety of food in Canada and the Netherlands was systematically compared. On the basis of two nationally representative samples, it was examined to what extent differences in consumer confidence between the two countries resulted from differences in the relative importance of the determinants of confidence, and differences in the means of the constructs. No differences between Canada and the Netherlands were found regarding the relative importance of the determinants, which provides support for the generalizability of the framework. However, results indicated that Dutch consumers had a higher level of optimism and a lower level of pessimism regarding the safety of food, which appeared to be mainly related to Dutch consumers¿ lower level of concern about factors related to production. The results also indicated cross-national differences in consumer recall of food safety issues in the media. Keywords: Food safety; Confidence; Trust; Risk management; Risk communication; Risk perception

AB - A thorough understanding of consumer confidence in the safety of food and the factors by which this is influenced is necessary for the development of adequate and effective risk management and communication regarding food safety issues. As food chains become globalized, risk management and communication are increasingly applied at international levels. As a consequence, cross-culturally valid theoretical models are needed to investigate consumer confidence in the safety of food. In this study, consumer confidence in the safety of food in Canada and the Netherlands was systematically compared. On the basis of two nationally representative samples, it was examined to what extent differences in consumer confidence between the two countries resulted from differences in the relative importance of the determinants of confidence, and differences in the means of the constructs. No differences between Canada and the Netherlands were found regarding the relative importance of the determinants, which provides support for the generalizability of the framework. However, results indicated that Dutch consumers had a higher level of optimism and a lower level of pessimism regarding the safety of food, which appeared to be mainly related to Dutch consumers¿ lower level of concern about factors related to production. The results also indicated cross-national differences in consumer recall of food safety issues in the media. Keywords: Food safety; Confidence; Trust; Risk management; Risk communication; Risk perception

KW - mad-cow-disease

KW - confirmatory factor-analysis

KW - state worry questionnaire

KW - social amplification

KW - risk-management

KW - trust

KW - constructs

KW - distrust

KW - hazards

KW - choice

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.01.002

DO - 10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.01.002

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 439

EP - 451

JO - Food Quality and Preference

JF - Food Quality and Preference

SN - 0950-3293

IS - 5

ER -