Abstract
ABSTRACT. Recent policy developments in the area of livestock husbandry have
suggested that, from the perspective of optimizing animal welfare, new animal
husbandry systems should be developed that provide opportunities for livestock
animals to be raised in environments where they are permitted to engage in ``natural
behavior.¿¿ It is not known whether consumers regard animal husbandry issues as
important, and whether they differentiate between animal husbandry and other
animal welfare issues. The responsibility for the development of such systems is
allocated jointly between farmers, regulators, different actors in the food chain, and
consumers. This research focuses on understanding consumer attitudes and preferences
regarding the development and introduction of such systems, to ensure that
they are acceptable to consumers as well as producers, regulators, and scientists.
Consumer perceptions of animal welfare and animal husbandry practices were
evaluated using quantitative consumer survey, which focused on two animal husbandry
issues ¿ farmed pigs and farmed fish. Following pilot work, 1000 representative
Dutch consumers were sampled about their attitudes to either pig or fish
husbandry. The results indicated that consumers think about animal welfare in terms
of two broad categories related to their health and living environment, but do not
think about welfare issues at a more detailed level. Greater concern was expressed
about the welfare of pigs compared to fish. Consumer trust in labeling also emerged
as an important issue, since consumers need to trust different food chain actors with
responsibility for promoting animal welfare, and are reluctant to consider the details
of animal husbandry systems. As a consequence, a transparent, enforceable, and
traceable monitoring system for animal welfare friendly products is likely to be
important for consumers.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 345-367 |
Journal | Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2005 |
Keywords
- genetically-modified foods
- risks
- welfare
- ethics
- trust
- meat
- credibility
- information
- perception
- benefits