TY - JOUR
T1 - ‘Conceptualizations and implementation of user engagement in Weather and climate services: A climate services providers’ perspective
AU - Di Fant, Valeria
AU - Pozo Garcia, Maria
AU - Gulikers, Judith
AU - Paparrizos, Spyros
PY - 2024/1/15
Y1 - 2024/1/15
N2 - Weather and Climate Information Services are increasingly used worldwide to facilitate the provision of information to their intended users. Despite this, the definition, classification and evaluation of climate services remains highly debated, particularly regarding user engagement. High forms of user engagement like co-production and co-creation are the least understood. This study looks at three case studies to clarify the current understanding of user engagement in climate services. The research identifies explicit and implicit conceptualizations of user engagement by service providers and characterizes their implementation. The study confirms the current lack of clarity for providers regarding the terminology used to describe user engagement in climate services, which calls for a different understanding of user engagement that allows to better embrace its complexity. Furthermore, our findings reveal that the highest form of user engagement occurred in the case study where there was a shared understanding of how service providers conceptualized user engagement. This conceptualization was aligned with the actual user engagement strategies implemented in the project. This stresses the importance of a shared understanding of user engagement terminology. Finally, the same service is often found to have implemented different user engagement levels at different stages and for different elements of the products. This brings up the issue of how to best describe user engagement in such situations. We recommend embracing the multi-faceted nature of user engagement in climate services by characterizing different elements and stages differently.
AB - Weather and Climate Information Services are increasingly used worldwide to facilitate the provision of information to their intended users. Despite this, the definition, classification and evaluation of climate services remains highly debated, particularly regarding user engagement. High forms of user engagement like co-production and co-creation are the least understood. This study looks at three case studies to clarify the current understanding of user engagement in climate services. The research identifies explicit and implicit conceptualizations of user engagement by service providers and characterizes their implementation. The study confirms the current lack of clarity for providers regarding the terminology used to describe user engagement in climate services, which calls for a different understanding of user engagement that allows to better embrace its complexity. Furthermore, our findings reveal that the highest form of user engagement occurred in the case study where there was a shared understanding of how service providers conceptualized user engagement. This conceptualization was aligned with the actual user engagement strategies implemented in the project. This stresses the importance of a shared understanding of user engagement terminology. Finally, the same service is often found to have implemented different user engagement levels at different stages and for different elements of the products. This brings up the issue of how to best describe user engagement in such situations. We recommend embracing the multi-faceted nature of user engagement in climate services by characterizing different elements and stages differently.
U2 - 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22940
DO - 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22940
M3 - Article
SN - 2405-8440
VL - 10
JO - Heliyon
JF - Heliyon
IS - 1
M1 - e22940
ER -