Comparison of camel, buffalo, cow, goat, and sheep yoghurts in terms of various physicochemical, biochemical, textural and rheological properties

Murat Emre Terzioğlu, İhsan Bakırcı, Emel Oz, Charles S. Brennan, Thom Huppertz, Ryszard Amarowicz, Mohammad Rizwan Khan, Tahra Elobeid, Rana Muhammad Aadil, Fatih Oz*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Comparative physicochemical, biochemical, textural, and rheological properties of yoghurts produced using buffalo, camel, cow, goat, and sheep milk were analysed. The physicochemical, textural, and rheological properties were determined over a 14-day storage period. Different animal milk types had a significant effect on all physicochemical analyses, fatty acid composition, conjugated linoleic acid content, cholesterol content, all amino acids except asparagine, ACE inhibitory activity, citric acid, and orotic acid, as well as other textural and rheological properties, except flow index n parameter. The storage period had a very significant effect on titratable acidity, pH value, firmness, consistency, cohesiveness, and yield stress τ0 parameters. Compared with other yoghurts studied, camel yoghurt was richer in terms of myristic acid from saturated fatty acids, ∑PUFA, arginine, lysine, phenylalanine, tryptophan, valine from essential amino acids, glutamic acid, and proline from non-essential amino acids, ACE inhibitory activity value, and hippuric and orotic acids

Original languageEnglish
Article number105749
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Dairy Journal
Volume146
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of camel, buffalo, cow, goat, and sheep yoghurts in terms of various physicochemical, biochemical, textural and rheological properties'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this