Comparison of anonymous and targeted molecular markers for the estimation of genetic diversity in ex situ conserved Lactuca

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    32 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The anonymous marker systems microsatellites (simple sequence repeats), amplified fragment length polymorphisms and sequence-specific amplified polymorphisms were compared with the targeted marker systems sequence-related amplified polymorphisms, target region amplification polymorphisms and nucleotide binding site profiling for their ability to describe the genetic diversity in a selected set of 80 Lactuca accessions. The accessions were also described morphologically, and all characterisation methods were evaluated against the genetic diversity assessed by a panel of three crop experts. The morphological data showed a low level of association with the molecular data, and did not display a consistently better relationship with the experts’ assessments in comparison with the molecular data. In general, the diversity described by the targeted molecular markers did not differ markedly from that of the anonymous markers, resulting in only slight differences in performance when related to the expert-based assessments. It was argued that markers targeted to specific gene sequences may still behave as anonymous markers and that the type of marker system used is irrelevant when at low taxonomic levels a clear genetic structure is absent due to intensive breeding activities
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1265-1279
    JournalTheoretical and Applied Genetics
    Volume119
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Keywords

    • sativa l.
    • lettuce
    • aflp
    • polymorphism
    • genome
    • populations
    • collection
    • resistance
    • ssap
    • srap

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of anonymous and targeted molecular markers for the estimation of genetic diversity in ex situ conserved Lactuca'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this