Abstract
Quantitative proteomics approaches using stable isotopes are well-known and used in many labs nowadays. More recently, high resolution quantitative approaches are reported that rely on LC-MS quantitation of peptide concentrations by comparing peak intensities between multiple runs obtained by continuous detection in MS mode. Characteristic of these comparative LC-MS procedures is that they do not rely on the use of stable isotopes; therefore the procedure is often referred to as label-free LC-MS. In order to compare at comprehensive scale peak intensity data in multiple LC-MS datasets, dedicated software is required for detection, matching and alignment of peaks. The high accuracy in quantitative determination of peptide abundancies provides an impressive level of detail. This approach also requires an experimental set-up where quantitative aspects of protein extraction and reproducible separation conditions need to be well controlled. In this paper we will provide insight in the critical parameters that affect the quality of the results and list an overview of the most recent software packages that are available for this procedure
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 731-749 |
| Journal | Proteomics |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- chromatography-mass spectrometry
- quantitative proteomic analysis
- protein identification technology
- missing value estimation
- time tag strategy
- liquid-chromatography
- accurate mass
- biomarker discovery
- microarray data
- breast-cancer
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative LC-MS: A landscape of Peaks and Valleys'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver