Abstract
Background
Glass membrane feeders are used in malaria research for artificial blood feeding. This study investigates the use of Hemotek membrane feeders as a standardized alternative feeding system.
Methods
Hemotek feeders were compared with glass feeders by assessing mosquito feeding rate, imbibed blood meal volume and Plasmodium falciparum infection intensity on mosquito guts.
Results
While mosquito feeding rate and blood meal volume were comparable between Hemotek and glass feeders, a loss in transmission was observed using the Hemotek feeder with a conventional collagen membrane. There was no difference in transmission between both feeders when Parafilm was used as the membrane.
Conclusions
Hemotek feeders with a Parafilm membrane can be used as an alternative feeding system for malaria transmission research.
Glass membrane feeders are used in malaria research for artificial blood feeding. This study investigates the use of Hemotek membrane feeders as a standardized alternative feeding system.
Methods
Hemotek feeders were compared with glass feeders by assessing mosquito feeding rate, imbibed blood meal volume and Plasmodium falciparum infection intensity on mosquito guts.
Results
While mosquito feeding rate and blood meal volume were comparable between Hemotek and glass feeders, a loss in transmission was observed using the Hemotek feeder with a conventional collagen membrane. There was no difference in transmission between both feeders when Parafilm was used as the membrane.
Conclusions
Hemotek feeders with a Parafilm membrane can be used as an alternative feeding system for malaria transmission research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | trac135 |
| Pages (from-to) | 476-478 |
| Journal | Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene |
| Volume | 117 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Early online date | 13 Jan 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Jun 2023 |
