Comment on “Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?” by Christopher Hutton et al.

Lieke A. Melsen*, Paul J.J.F. Torfs, Remko Uijlenhoet, Ryan Teuling

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We discuss two definitions of reproducibility, and question if both definitions are required to be met in computational hydrological studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2568-2569
JournalWater Resources Research
Volume53
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

hydrology
science

Keywords

  • computational hydrology
  • repeatability
  • reproducibility

Cite this

@article{0c0cf96e9bf64343b41a58ca4427f4b3,
title = "Comment on “Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?” by Christopher Hutton et al.",
abstract = "We discuss two definitions of reproducibility, and question if both definitions are required to be met in computational hydrological studies.",
keywords = "computational hydrology, repeatability, reproducibility",
author = "Melsen, {Lieke A.} and Torfs, {Paul J.J.F.} and Remko Uijlenhoet and Ryan Teuling",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1002/2016WR020208",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "2568--2569",
journal = "Water Resources Research",
issn = "0043-1397",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "3",

}

Comment on “Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?” by Christopher Hutton et al. / Melsen, Lieke A.; Torfs, Paul J.J.F.; Uijlenhoet, Remko; Teuling, Ryan.

In: Water Resources Research, Vol. 53, No. 3, 2017, p. 2568-2569.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comment on “Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?” by Christopher Hutton et al.

AU - Melsen, Lieke A.

AU - Torfs, Paul J.J.F.

AU - Uijlenhoet, Remko

AU - Teuling, Ryan

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - We discuss two definitions of reproducibility, and question if both definitions are required to be met in computational hydrological studies.

AB - We discuss two definitions of reproducibility, and question if both definitions are required to be met in computational hydrological studies.

KW - computational hydrology

KW - repeatability

KW - reproducibility

U2 - 10.1002/2016WR020208

DO - 10.1002/2016WR020208

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

VL - 53

SP - 2568

EP - 2569

JO - Water Resources Research

JF - Water Resources Research

SN - 0043-1397

IS - 3

ER -