Comment on "Marine plastic debris emits a keystone infochemical for olfactory foraging seabirds" by Savoca et al.

Gaia dell'Ariccia, Richard A. Phillips, J.A. van Franeker, Nicolas Gaidet, Paulo Catrey, Jose P. Granadeiro, Peter G. Ryan, Franceso Bonadonna

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In their recent paper, Savoca and collaborators (2016) showed that plastic debris in the ocean may acquire a dimethyl sulfide (DMS) signature from biofouling developing on their surface. According to them, DMS emission may represent an olfactory trap for foraging seabirds, which explains patterns of plastic ingestion among procellariiform seabirds. This hypothesis is appealing, but some of the data that Savoca et al. used to support their claim are questionable, resulting in a misclassification of species, as well as other decisions regarding the variables
to include in their models. Furthermore, with their focus on a single lifestyle trait (nesting habit) of dubious relevance for explaining plastic ingestion, Savoca et al. neglect the opportunity to explore other factors that might provide better ecological insight. Finally, we are deeply concerned by the conservation policy recommendation proposed by Savoca et al.—to increase antifouling properties of consumer plastics—which constitutes a substantial environmental risk and delivers the wrong message to decision-makers. The reduction of plastic consumption, waste prevention, and proactive reuse through a circular economy should be at the heart of policy recommendations for future mitigation efforts.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere1700526
Number of pages3
JournalScience Advances
Volume3
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

seabird
plastic
sulfide
biofouling
antifouling
environmental risk
lifestyle
mitigation
ocean
recommendation
decision

Cite this

dell'Ariccia, Gaia ; Phillips, Richard A. ; van Franeker, J.A. ; Gaidet, Nicolas ; Catrey, Paulo ; Granadeiro, Jose P. ; Ryan, Peter G. ; Bonadonna, Franceso. / Comment on "Marine plastic debris emits a keystone infochemical for olfactory foraging seabirds" by Savoca et al. In: Science Advances. 2017 ; Vol. 3, No. 6.
@article{4fc133af5aef4b2ea7b48468f4bbb869,
title = "Comment on {"}Marine plastic debris emits a keystone infochemical for olfactory foraging seabirds{"} by Savoca et al.",
abstract = "In their recent paper, Savoca and collaborators (2016) showed that plastic debris in the ocean may acquire a dimethyl sulfide (DMS) signature from biofouling developing on their surface. According to them, DMS emission may represent an olfactory trap for foraging seabirds, which explains patterns of plastic ingestion among procellariiform seabirds. This hypothesis is appealing, but some of the data that Savoca et al. used to support their claim are questionable, resulting in a misclassification of species, as well as other decisions regarding the variablesto include in their models. Furthermore, with their focus on a single lifestyle trait (nesting habit) of dubious relevance for explaining plastic ingestion, Savoca et al. neglect the opportunity to explore other factors that might provide better ecological insight. Finally, we are deeply concerned by the conservation policy recommendation proposed by Savoca et al.—to increase antifouling properties of consumer plastics—which constitutes a substantial environmental risk and delivers the wrong message to decision-makers. The reduction of plastic consumption, waste prevention, and proactive reuse through a circular economy should be at the heart of policy recommendations for future mitigation efforts.",
author = "Gaia dell'Ariccia and Phillips, {Richard A.} and {van Franeker}, J.A. and Nicolas Gaidet and Paulo Catrey and Granadeiro, {Jose P.} and Ryan, {Peter G.} and Franceso Bonadonna",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1126/sciadv.1700526",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
journal = "Science Advances",
issn = "2375-2548",
publisher = "American Association for the Advancement of Science",
number = "6",

}

dell'Ariccia, G, Phillips, RA, van Franeker, JA, Gaidet, N, Catrey, P, Granadeiro, JP, Ryan, PG & Bonadonna, F 2017, 'Comment on "Marine plastic debris emits a keystone infochemical for olfactory foraging seabirds" by Savoca et al.', Science Advances, vol. 3, no. 6, e1700526. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700526

Comment on "Marine plastic debris emits a keystone infochemical for olfactory foraging seabirds" by Savoca et al. / dell'Ariccia, Gaia; Phillips, Richard A.; van Franeker, J.A.; Gaidet, Nicolas; Catrey, Paulo; Granadeiro, Jose P.; Ryan, Peter G.; Bonadonna, Franceso.

In: Science Advances, Vol. 3, No. 6, e1700526, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comment on "Marine plastic debris emits a keystone infochemical for olfactory foraging seabirds" by Savoca et al.

AU - dell'Ariccia, Gaia

AU - Phillips, Richard A.

AU - van Franeker, J.A.

AU - Gaidet, Nicolas

AU - Catrey, Paulo

AU - Granadeiro, Jose P.

AU - Ryan, Peter G.

AU - Bonadonna, Franceso

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - In their recent paper, Savoca and collaborators (2016) showed that plastic debris in the ocean may acquire a dimethyl sulfide (DMS) signature from biofouling developing on their surface. According to them, DMS emission may represent an olfactory trap for foraging seabirds, which explains patterns of plastic ingestion among procellariiform seabirds. This hypothesis is appealing, but some of the data that Savoca et al. used to support their claim are questionable, resulting in a misclassification of species, as well as other decisions regarding the variablesto include in their models. Furthermore, with their focus on a single lifestyle trait (nesting habit) of dubious relevance for explaining plastic ingestion, Savoca et al. neglect the opportunity to explore other factors that might provide better ecological insight. Finally, we are deeply concerned by the conservation policy recommendation proposed by Savoca et al.—to increase antifouling properties of consumer plastics—which constitutes a substantial environmental risk and delivers the wrong message to decision-makers. The reduction of plastic consumption, waste prevention, and proactive reuse through a circular economy should be at the heart of policy recommendations for future mitigation efforts.

AB - In their recent paper, Savoca and collaborators (2016) showed that plastic debris in the ocean may acquire a dimethyl sulfide (DMS) signature from biofouling developing on their surface. According to them, DMS emission may represent an olfactory trap for foraging seabirds, which explains patterns of plastic ingestion among procellariiform seabirds. This hypothesis is appealing, but some of the data that Savoca et al. used to support their claim are questionable, resulting in a misclassification of species, as well as other decisions regarding the variablesto include in their models. Furthermore, with their focus on a single lifestyle trait (nesting habit) of dubious relevance for explaining plastic ingestion, Savoca et al. neglect the opportunity to explore other factors that might provide better ecological insight. Finally, we are deeply concerned by the conservation policy recommendation proposed by Savoca et al.—to increase antifouling properties of consumer plastics—which constitutes a substantial environmental risk and delivers the wrong message to decision-makers. The reduction of plastic consumption, waste prevention, and proactive reuse through a circular economy should be at the heart of policy recommendations for future mitigation efforts.

U2 - 10.1126/sciadv.1700526

DO - 10.1126/sciadv.1700526

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

VL - 3

JO - Science Advances

JF - Science Advances

SN - 2375-2548

IS - 6

M1 - e1700526

ER -