Collection behaviour of lightweight packaging waste by individual households and implications for the analysis of collection schemes

E.U. Thoden van Velzen*, M.T. Brouwer, Alexander Feil

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The separate collection behaviour of 21 Dutch households was explored. Their lightweight packaging waste (LWP) and mixed municipal solid waste (MSW) was studied twice in detail. The derived net collection yields for plastic packages and beverage cartons were high (mostly between 80 and 100%). A detailed analysis revealed that several packaging types were almost completely separate collected by these households. This observation led to the hypothesis that several packaging types will always be completely separate collected by participating civilians. Five indicator items were chosen and their concentrations in mixed MSW and LWP were used to calculate the minimal participation rate (PRmin) for collection areas. This PRmin is an underestimation of the true participation rate since the population within a collection area will also contain non-ideal separating individuals. Analysis of 15 different municipalities with this new methodology revealed that the PRmin varied strongly from roughly 30% for a municipality with a drop-off collection scheme for only plastic packaging and no PAYT financial trigger to almost 90% for municipalities with a kerbside collection scheme for LWP and a PAYT financial trigger. Surprisingly, participating civilians in all collection schemes kept roughly the same share of desired plastic packages (DPP) separate (73 ± 11%) in all collection schemes. This share is derived from the PRmin and hence a slight over-estimation. The latter was named the maximum selection rate for desired plastic packages (SRmaxDPP). The PRmin and SRmaxDPP form the basis of a new set of technical performance indicators for separate collection schemes of LWP.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)284-293
JournalWaste Management
Volume89
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

packaging waste
plastic
municipal solid waste
methodology
analysis
household
packaging
rate
municipality
participation
indicator

Cite this

@article{54249ea4512b4e7ea2b1b8cfc76c53c5,
title = "Collection behaviour of lightweight packaging waste by individual households and implications for the analysis of collection schemes",
abstract = "The separate collection behaviour of 21 Dutch households was explored. Their lightweight packaging waste (LWP) and mixed municipal solid waste (MSW) was studied twice in detail. The derived net collection yields for plastic packages and beverage cartons were high (mostly between 80 and 100{\%}). A detailed analysis revealed that several packaging types were almost completely separate collected by these households. This observation led to the hypothesis that several packaging types will always be completely separate collected by participating civilians. Five indicator items were chosen and their concentrations in mixed MSW and LWP were used to calculate the minimal participation rate (PRmin) for collection areas. This PRmin is an underestimation of the true participation rate since the population within a collection area will also contain non-ideal separating individuals. Analysis of 15 different municipalities with this new methodology revealed that the PRmin varied strongly from roughly 30{\%} for a municipality with a drop-off collection scheme for only plastic packaging and no PAYT financial trigger to almost 90{\%} for municipalities with a kerbside collection scheme for LWP and a PAYT financial trigger. Surprisingly, participating civilians in all collection schemes kept roughly the same share of desired plastic packages (DPP) separate (73 ± 11{\%}) in all collection schemes. This share is derived from the PRmin and hence a slight over-estimation. The latter was named the maximum selection rate for desired plastic packages (SRmaxDPP). The PRmin and SRmaxDPP form the basis of a new set of technical performance indicators for separate collection schemes of LWP.",
author = "{Thoden van Velzen}, E.U. and M.T. Brouwer and Alexander Feil",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.wasman.2019.04.021",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
pages = "284--293",
journal = "Waste Management",
issn = "0956-053X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Collection behaviour of lightweight packaging waste by individual households and implications for the analysis of collection schemes. / Thoden van Velzen, E.U.; Brouwer, M.T.; Feil, Alexander.

In: Waste Management, Vol. 89, 15.04.2019, p. 284-293.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collection behaviour of lightweight packaging waste by individual households and implications for the analysis of collection schemes

AU - Thoden van Velzen, E.U.

AU - Brouwer, M.T.

AU - Feil, Alexander

PY - 2019/4/15

Y1 - 2019/4/15

N2 - The separate collection behaviour of 21 Dutch households was explored. Their lightweight packaging waste (LWP) and mixed municipal solid waste (MSW) was studied twice in detail. The derived net collection yields for plastic packages and beverage cartons were high (mostly between 80 and 100%). A detailed analysis revealed that several packaging types were almost completely separate collected by these households. This observation led to the hypothesis that several packaging types will always be completely separate collected by participating civilians. Five indicator items were chosen and their concentrations in mixed MSW and LWP were used to calculate the minimal participation rate (PRmin) for collection areas. This PRmin is an underestimation of the true participation rate since the population within a collection area will also contain non-ideal separating individuals. Analysis of 15 different municipalities with this new methodology revealed that the PRmin varied strongly from roughly 30% for a municipality with a drop-off collection scheme for only plastic packaging and no PAYT financial trigger to almost 90% for municipalities with a kerbside collection scheme for LWP and a PAYT financial trigger. Surprisingly, participating civilians in all collection schemes kept roughly the same share of desired plastic packages (DPP) separate (73 ± 11%) in all collection schemes. This share is derived from the PRmin and hence a slight over-estimation. The latter was named the maximum selection rate for desired plastic packages (SRmaxDPP). The PRmin and SRmaxDPP form the basis of a new set of technical performance indicators for separate collection schemes of LWP.

AB - The separate collection behaviour of 21 Dutch households was explored. Their lightweight packaging waste (LWP) and mixed municipal solid waste (MSW) was studied twice in detail. The derived net collection yields for plastic packages and beverage cartons were high (mostly between 80 and 100%). A detailed analysis revealed that several packaging types were almost completely separate collected by these households. This observation led to the hypothesis that several packaging types will always be completely separate collected by participating civilians. Five indicator items were chosen and their concentrations in mixed MSW and LWP were used to calculate the minimal participation rate (PRmin) for collection areas. This PRmin is an underestimation of the true participation rate since the population within a collection area will also contain non-ideal separating individuals. Analysis of 15 different municipalities with this new methodology revealed that the PRmin varied strongly from roughly 30% for a municipality with a drop-off collection scheme for only plastic packaging and no PAYT financial trigger to almost 90% for municipalities with a kerbside collection scheme for LWP and a PAYT financial trigger. Surprisingly, participating civilians in all collection schemes kept roughly the same share of desired plastic packages (DPP) separate (73 ± 11%) in all collection schemes. This share is derived from the PRmin and hence a slight over-estimation. The latter was named the maximum selection rate for desired plastic packages (SRmaxDPP). The PRmin and SRmaxDPP form the basis of a new set of technical performance indicators for separate collection schemes of LWP.

U2 - 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.04.021

DO - 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.04.021

M3 - Article

VL - 89

SP - 284

EP - 293

JO - Waste Management

JF - Waste Management

SN - 0956-053X

ER -