Co-managing public research in Australian fisheries through convergence–divergence processes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The participation of the industry in public research has been found essential to stimulate innovation in fisheries, but the actual design and implementation of co-management of fisheries research is still a critical and open topic. Based on the evidence of 35 project cases in Australian fisheries, this paper analyses a convergence–divergence process to support participatory research. The analysis first entails a description of the levels of stakeholders involved and the resources allocated at each step of the research process. This leads to a discussion on the impacts of the research process at different stages depending on how different sections of the industry (constituencies) were engaged. The results show that allocating time, resources and opportunities for industry representatives to engage with their constituencies is a crucial divergence phase of research processes that complements multi-stakeholder deliberations in convergence phases. Consequently, this paper contributes to the debate on research co-management processes by discussing the role of iterative knowledge sharing among stakeholders at multiple levels (e.g. fishers, processing industry, fishery associations and policymakers) in fisheries systems.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)259-271
JournalMarine Policy
Volume60
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

public research
fishery
fisheries
research process
co-management
stakeholders
industry
stakeholder
collaborative management
comanagement
deliberation
resources
divergence
resource
public
Fisheries
Public research
complement
innovation
participation

Cite this

@article{42306211702f4e8c837096b137da51d8,
title = "Co-managing public research in Australian fisheries through convergence–divergence processes",
abstract = "The participation of the industry in public research has been found essential to stimulate innovation in fisheries, but the actual design and implementation of co-management of fisheries research is still a critical and open topic. Based on the evidence of 35 project cases in Australian fisheries, this paper analyses a convergence–divergence process to support participatory research. The analysis first entails a description of the levels of stakeholders involved and the resources allocated at each step of the research process. This leads to a discussion on the impacts of the research process at different stages depending on how different sections of the industry (constituencies) were engaged. The results show that allocating time, resources and opportunities for industry representatives to engage with their constituencies is a crucial divergence phase of research processes that complements multi-stakeholder deliberations in convergence phases. Consequently, this paper contributes to the debate on research co-management processes by discussing the role of iterative knowledge sharing among stakeholders at multiple levels (e.g. fishers, processing industry, fishery associations and policymakers) in fisheries systems.",
author = "D. Dentoni and L.W.A. Klerkx",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.marpol.2015.07.001",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "259--271",
journal = "Marine Policy",
issn = "0308-597X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Co-managing public research in Australian fisheries through convergence–divergence processes. / Dentoni, D.; Klerkx, L.W.A.

In: Marine Policy, Vol. 60, 2015, p. 259-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Co-managing public research in Australian fisheries through convergence–divergence processes

AU - Dentoni, D.

AU - Klerkx, L.W.A.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The participation of the industry in public research has been found essential to stimulate innovation in fisheries, but the actual design and implementation of co-management of fisheries research is still a critical and open topic. Based on the evidence of 35 project cases in Australian fisheries, this paper analyses a convergence–divergence process to support participatory research. The analysis first entails a description of the levels of stakeholders involved and the resources allocated at each step of the research process. This leads to a discussion on the impacts of the research process at different stages depending on how different sections of the industry (constituencies) were engaged. The results show that allocating time, resources and opportunities for industry representatives to engage with their constituencies is a crucial divergence phase of research processes that complements multi-stakeholder deliberations in convergence phases. Consequently, this paper contributes to the debate on research co-management processes by discussing the role of iterative knowledge sharing among stakeholders at multiple levels (e.g. fishers, processing industry, fishery associations and policymakers) in fisheries systems.

AB - The participation of the industry in public research has been found essential to stimulate innovation in fisheries, but the actual design and implementation of co-management of fisheries research is still a critical and open topic. Based on the evidence of 35 project cases in Australian fisheries, this paper analyses a convergence–divergence process to support participatory research. The analysis first entails a description of the levels of stakeholders involved and the resources allocated at each step of the research process. This leads to a discussion on the impacts of the research process at different stages depending on how different sections of the industry (constituencies) were engaged. The results show that allocating time, resources and opportunities for industry representatives to engage with their constituencies is a crucial divergence phase of research processes that complements multi-stakeholder deliberations in convergence phases. Consequently, this paper contributes to the debate on research co-management processes by discussing the role of iterative knowledge sharing among stakeholders at multiple levels (e.g. fishers, processing industry, fishery associations and policymakers) in fisheries systems.

U2 - 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.07.001

DO - 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.07.001

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 259

EP - 271

JO - Marine Policy

JF - Marine Policy

SN - 0308-597X

ER -