Climate Litigation, Politics and Policy Change: Lessons from Urgenda and Climate Case Ireland

Sadhbh O'Neill; E.C. Alblas

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-47587-1_4

Climate Litigation, Politics and Policy Change: Lessons from Urgenda and Climate Case Ireland

Sadhbh O'Neill^*, E.C. Alblas

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Academic › peer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Concerned citizens and civil society organisations are increasingly turning to the courts to seek legal clarifications, remedies and enforcement of countries’ legal obligations in relation to climate change. Focusing on the policy dimensions of climate litigation, this chapter will provide an in-depth analysis of the current archetype of climate litigation—the Dutch Urgenda case, as well as Irish counterpart, Climate Case Ireland. While the two have had different outcomes to date, in both cases climate litigation has proven to be an important tool to push climate change into a central position not only in the legal sphere but also in political and policy discourse. To analyse the full impact of a climate litigation action, we argue that it is important to look not only at legal outcomes but also at the way in which the litigation effort as such shapes political discourse and the policy agenda.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Ireland and the Climate Crisis
Publisher	Palgrave Macmillan
Pages	57-72
Number of pages	16
ISBN (Electronic)	9783030475871
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47587-1_4
Publication status	Published - 2020
Externally published	Yes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-030-47587-1_4

Cite this

@inbook{ed8d665ee9f14cd1acab9ac356282909,

title = "Climate Litigation, Politics and Policy Change: Lessons from Urgenda and Climate Case Ireland",

abstract = "Concerned citizens and civil society organisations are increasingly turning to the courts to seek legal clarifications, remedies and enforcement of countries{\textquoteright} legal obligations in relation to climate change. Focusing on the policy dimensions of climate litigation, this chapter will provide an in-depth analysis of the current archetype of climate litigation—the Dutch Urgenda case, as well as Irish counterpart, Climate Case Ireland. While the two have had different outcomes to date, in both cases climate litigation has proven to be an important tool to push climate change into a central position not only in the legal sphere but also in political and policy discourse. To analyse the full impact of a climate litigation action, we argue that it is important to look not only at legal outcomes but also at the way in which the litigation effort as such shapes political discourse and the policy agenda.",

author = "Sadhbh O'Neill and E.C. Alblas",

year = "2020",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-47587-1_4",

language = "English",

pages = "57--72",

booktitle = "Ireland and the Climate Crisis",

publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",

address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Climate Litigation, Politics and Policy Change: Lessons from Urgenda and Climate Case Ireland

AU - O'Neill, Sadhbh

AU - Alblas, E.C.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Concerned citizens and civil society organisations are increasingly turning to the courts to seek legal clarifications, remedies and enforcement of countries’ legal obligations in relation to climate change. Focusing on the policy dimensions of climate litigation, this chapter will provide an in-depth analysis of the current archetype of climate litigation—the Dutch Urgenda case, as well as Irish counterpart, Climate Case Ireland. While the two have had different outcomes to date, in both cases climate litigation has proven to be an important tool to push climate change into a central position not only in the legal sphere but also in political and policy discourse. To analyse the full impact of a climate litigation action, we argue that it is important to look not only at legal outcomes but also at the way in which the litigation effort as such shapes political discourse and the policy agenda.

AB - Concerned citizens and civil society organisations are increasingly turning to the courts to seek legal clarifications, remedies and enforcement of countries’ legal obligations in relation to climate change. Focusing on the policy dimensions of climate litigation, this chapter will provide an in-depth analysis of the current archetype of climate litigation—the Dutch Urgenda case, as well as Irish counterpart, Climate Case Ireland. While the two have had different outcomes to date, in both cases climate litigation has proven to be an important tool to push climate change into a central position not only in the legal sphere but also in political and policy discourse. To analyse the full impact of a climate litigation action, we argue that it is important to look not only at legal outcomes but also at the way in which the litigation effort as such shapes political discourse and the policy agenda.

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-47587-1_4

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-47587-1_4

M3 - Chapter

SP - 57

EP - 72

BT - Ireland and the Climate Crisis

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

ER -

Climate Litigation, Politics and Policy Change: Lessons from Urgenda and Climate Case Ireland

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this