Certify sustainable retailers?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Third-party eco-certification has received considerable attention by academics and practitioners alike as a new mode of sustainability governance. But there is growing evidence that certification faces a number of limits when applied to producers in developing countries, in particular the weak capabilities of small-holder producers to comply with the standards set out by these certification schemes. When these producers make up between 70% and 80% of the estimated 117 million fish farmers worldwide (Bondad-Reantaso & Subasinghe, 2013; Valderrma, Hishamunda, & Zhou, 2010), we can question how certification can meet its own goals of transforming industries towards sustainability. This chapter extends current debates over the capability of producers to comply with standards by arguing for an alternative certification arrangement. Instead of continuing with the current model of certification that places the ‘burden of proof’ for sustainability on producers, I propose a new form of retail-targeted certification that reverses this burden of proof. Under such a model, it is not small-holders who have to demonstrate sustainability, but instead the buyers and retailers who receive a disproportionate benefit from the marketing and trade of their fish. A retailer certification scheme would reverse this burden of proof by giving recognition and market reward to retailers adopting ‘developmental’ forms of value-chain coordination that foster inclusive and effective support for improving the production practices of small-holders. Such a model might be relevant for any globally traded commodity sector involving small-holder producers in need of (but unable to independently make) improvements towards sustainability.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSustainable Food Futures
Subtitle of host publicationMultidisplinary solutions
EditorsJessica Duncan, Megan Bailey
PublisherEarthscan/Routledge
Chapter10
Pages133-144
ISBN (Electronic)9781315463131
ISBN (Print)9781315463117, 9781138206168
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Publication series

NameRoutledge Studies in Food, Society and the Environment
PublisherEarthscan/Routledge

Fingerprint

certification
producer
sustainability
value chain
commodity
reward
farmer
marketing
developing country
governance
industry
market
evidence

Cite this

Bush, S. R. (2017). Certify sustainable retailers? In J. Duncan, & M. Bailey (Eds.), Sustainable Food Futures: Multidisplinary solutions (pp. 133-144). (Routledge Studies in Food, Society and the Environment). Earthscan/Routledge.
Bush, S.R. / Certify sustainable retailers?. Sustainable Food Futures: Multidisplinary solutions. editor / Jessica Duncan ; Megan Bailey. Earthscan/Routledge, 2017. pp. 133-144 (Routledge Studies in Food, Society and the Environment).
@inbook{79983c8c5acf413893e158958b8b7697,
title = "Certify sustainable retailers?",
abstract = "Third-party eco-certification has received considerable attention by academics and practitioners alike as a new mode of sustainability governance. But there is growing evidence that certification faces a number of limits when applied to producers in developing countries, in particular the weak capabilities of small-holder producers to comply with the standards set out by these certification schemes. When these producers make up between 70{\%} and 80{\%} of the estimated 117 million fish farmers worldwide (Bondad-Reantaso & Subasinghe, 2013; Valderrma, Hishamunda, & Zhou, 2010), we can question how certification can meet its own goals of transforming industries towards sustainability. This chapter extends current debates over the capability of producers to comply with standards by arguing for an alternative certification arrangement. Instead of continuing with the current model of certification that places the ‘burden of proof’ for sustainability on producers, I propose a new form of retail-targeted certification that reverses this burden of proof. Under such a model, it is not small-holders who have to demonstrate sustainability, but instead the buyers and retailers who receive a disproportionate benefit from the marketing and trade of their fish. A retailer certification scheme would reverse this burden of proof by giving recognition and market reward to retailers adopting ‘developmental’ forms of value-chain coordination that foster inclusive and effective support for improving the production practices of small-holders. Such a model might be relevant for any globally traded commodity sector involving small-holder producers in need of (but unable to independently make) improvements towards sustainability.",
author = "S.R. Bush",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781315463117",
series = "Routledge Studies in Food, Society and the Environment",
publisher = "Earthscan/Routledge",
pages = "133--144",
editor = "Jessica Duncan and Megan Bailey",
booktitle = "Sustainable Food Futures",

}

Bush, SR 2017, Certify sustainable retailers? in J Duncan & M Bailey (eds), Sustainable Food Futures: Multidisplinary solutions. Routledge Studies in Food, Society and the Environment, Earthscan/Routledge, pp. 133-144.

Certify sustainable retailers? / Bush, S.R.

Sustainable Food Futures: Multidisplinary solutions. ed. / Jessica Duncan; Megan Bailey. Earthscan/Routledge, 2017. p. 133-144 (Routledge Studies in Food, Society and the Environment).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Certify sustainable retailers?

AU - Bush, S.R.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Third-party eco-certification has received considerable attention by academics and practitioners alike as a new mode of sustainability governance. But there is growing evidence that certification faces a number of limits when applied to producers in developing countries, in particular the weak capabilities of small-holder producers to comply with the standards set out by these certification schemes. When these producers make up between 70% and 80% of the estimated 117 million fish farmers worldwide (Bondad-Reantaso & Subasinghe, 2013; Valderrma, Hishamunda, & Zhou, 2010), we can question how certification can meet its own goals of transforming industries towards sustainability. This chapter extends current debates over the capability of producers to comply with standards by arguing for an alternative certification arrangement. Instead of continuing with the current model of certification that places the ‘burden of proof’ for sustainability on producers, I propose a new form of retail-targeted certification that reverses this burden of proof. Under such a model, it is not small-holders who have to demonstrate sustainability, but instead the buyers and retailers who receive a disproportionate benefit from the marketing and trade of their fish. A retailer certification scheme would reverse this burden of proof by giving recognition and market reward to retailers adopting ‘developmental’ forms of value-chain coordination that foster inclusive and effective support for improving the production practices of small-holders. Such a model might be relevant for any globally traded commodity sector involving small-holder producers in need of (but unable to independently make) improvements towards sustainability.

AB - Third-party eco-certification has received considerable attention by academics and practitioners alike as a new mode of sustainability governance. But there is growing evidence that certification faces a number of limits when applied to producers in developing countries, in particular the weak capabilities of small-holder producers to comply with the standards set out by these certification schemes. When these producers make up between 70% and 80% of the estimated 117 million fish farmers worldwide (Bondad-Reantaso & Subasinghe, 2013; Valderrma, Hishamunda, & Zhou, 2010), we can question how certification can meet its own goals of transforming industries towards sustainability. This chapter extends current debates over the capability of producers to comply with standards by arguing for an alternative certification arrangement. Instead of continuing with the current model of certification that places the ‘burden of proof’ for sustainability on producers, I propose a new form of retail-targeted certification that reverses this burden of proof. Under such a model, it is not small-holders who have to demonstrate sustainability, but instead the buyers and retailers who receive a disproportionate benefit from the marketing and trade of their fish. A retailer certification scheme would reverse this burden of proof by giving recognition and market reward to retailers adopting ‘developmental’ forms of value-chain coordination that foster inclusive and effective support for improving the production practices of small-holders. Such a model might be relevant for any globally traded commodity sector involving small-holder producers in need of (but unable to independently make) improvements towards sustainability.

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781315463117

SN - 9781138206168

T3 - Routledge Studies in Food, Society and the Environment

SP - 133

EP - 144

BT - Sustainable Food Futures

A2 - Duncan, Jessica

A2 - Bailey, Megan

PB - Earthscan/Routledge

ER -

Bush SR. Certify sustainable retailers? In Duncan J, Bailey M, editors, Sustainable Food Futures: Multidisplinary solutions. Earthscan/Routledge. 2017. p. 133-144. (Routledge Studies in Food, Society and the Environment).